<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How should we use the remaining disks in the shelf partially configured for root aggr? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159913#M36543</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With older ONTAP (before version 9) you could store user data on root aggregates, but you shouldn't. With Clustered ONTAP 8.x, and later, you cannot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it a new system with no user data? And running ONTAP 8.3 or later? My question would be - why isn't the system using partitioned disks to enable using all 24 disks for user data?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 02:28:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-05T02:28:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How should we use the remaining disks in the shelf partially configured for root aggr?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159912#M36542</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a shelf with 24x890GB SSD disks. Currently, 2x3 of them have been assigned to 2 root aggrs respectively to two nodes in HA. then left total of 2x9x890G = 16TB physical space.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How should we use the 16TB space? creating separate aggregate seems too small. I&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I&amp;nbsp; add 8TB into the root aggregate, and create a separated volume for data, would that cause any potential issues?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:51:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159912#M36542</guid>
      <dc:creator>netappmagic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:51:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How should we use the remaining disks in the shelf partially configured for root aggr?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159913#M36543</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With older ONTAP (before version 9) you could store user data on root aggregates, but you shouldn't. With Clustered ONTAP 8.x, and later, you cannot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it a new system with no user data? And running ONTAP 8.3 or later? My question would be - why isn't the system using partitioned disks to enable using all 24 disks for user data?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 02:28:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159913#M36543</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-05T02:28:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How should we use the remaining disks in the shelf partially configured for root aggr?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159917#M36544</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is running cluster mode 9.6p7, and the shelf was added due to swap heads to A700's for increase root volumes required by the A700's.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the root aggr, rg0 is still using inherited R-D partition from old heads, but rg1 is using 3 new and entire 890GB disk's.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If we should not store user data on root aggr, why not? we will then left total of 16TB unused.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 10:00:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159917#M36544</guid>
      <dc:creator>netappmagic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-05T10:00:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How should we use the remaining disks in the shelf partially configured for root aggr?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159921#M36545</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No it is an ONTAP limitation. Use the disks to create a new aggregate on a single node.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 13:10:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159921#M36545</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul_stejskal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-05T13:10:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How should we use the remaining disks in the shelf partially configured for root aggr?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159943#M36559</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hmm. I think the headswap to the A700 could have been done differently - by adding the shelf to the existing system and partitioning the disks to add to the existing root aggr+volume before doing it, but I'm not sure exactly what led to the current situation, and I think moving away from it is probably too difficult to consider at this time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At this point, I think the best action would be to consider adding the SSDs as a seperate RAID group into an existing SSD data aggregate (even if they don't match in size, it would normally be ok) or create a new aggregate with just them in.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can send me a message with your system serial number and company name if you have autosupport on and would like me to take a more detailed look.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 05:40:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159943#M36559</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T05:40:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How should we use the remaining disks in the shelf partially configured for root aggr?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159950#M36564</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 11:24:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159950#M36564</guid>
      <dc:creator>heightsnj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T11:24:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How should we use the remaining disks in the shelf partially configured for root aggr?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159951#M36565</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/55504"&gt;@AlexDawson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In our case, we added the new 24x890GB SSD for increasing the required root volume size, but didn't partition them as you suggested we should.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As it is now, I am interested in two options that you pointed out, and would like you to weigh in which one I should go for.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. With total of 18x890GB, creating a new aggr on a node would cause two nodes in HA out of balance, personally, I prabably would not prefer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Adding 9x890GB to each node into the existing aggr as a new rg, AND deducting two disk as parities, that would probably add 6TB more in each aggr, assuming the size mismatching is alright,&amp;nbsp; is it worth doing it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am going to send you 2 serial numbers for these two new heads. Due to issues here with sending out on-demand Autosupport, you might not be able to see the updates, but there is a manually trigged one there.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot for your time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 11:36:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/How-should-we-use-the-remaining-disks-in-the-shelf-partially-configured-for-root/m-p/159951#M36565</guid>
      <dc:creator>netappmagic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-06T11:36:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

