<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SnapProtect questions in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15945#M3674</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all, hope you can help with my understanding here, not that I'm in the middle of deploying it or anything &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; never seeing the product before!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I want hourly snapshots kept for 48 hrs for example I have to create a seperate storage policy / backupset, OK I get that. It would be nice if I could do something in the extended retention rules for hourly and dailys and not just weeklys / monthlys / yearlys but its a Commvault product out of your control.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway so then if I want two weeks worth of dailys kept I create another storage policy / backup set and associate the same volumes to the subclient for backup. Correct me if I'm wrong here! Still all on the same local volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK so now ideally I want hourly snapmirrors then a daily snapvault. If I use my daily storage policy / backupset for an hourly snapmirror it doesn't work as from Commvault it sees the snaps as unique, and that there aren't other snapshots on the volume. So I have to do a daily snapshot followed by a daily snapmirror followed by a daily snapvault.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And if I use the hourly snap storage policy it'll create a seperate snapmirror, so thats out of the question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some additional info. I have a NCommServe backing up NetApp CIFS shares, and a proxy sever setup for VMware, using datastore affinities for the backup selection. All &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK so the stage is set....! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The main question am I doing this right, does this sound like the right way to go about things?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I use snapmirror.conf from the NetApp side to keep the snapmirror relationship thats understood by the SnapProtect daily storage policy to update the relationship hourly without breaking anything inside snapprotect? So I will then get my hourly snaps created on the primary across to DR. I'm not bothered about Snapprotect knowing about those on the DR snapmirror.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I protect multipe volumes (not qtrees) with a snapmirror aux copy to DR followed by a snapvault of the mirror where is the naming convention controlled? DFM? Is it the datasets I created? Not tried playing around with this bit yet, however if someone has an answer rather than trial and error that would be my preferred option. Any best practices on what you do to control snapvault destination names. Basically I'll have multiple volumes going into a single snapvault destination (fan in? see I am paying attention!) In all the demos it looks to be the sim where you only have a single controller, what I have done is rather than saying secondary / tertiary. I have called them&amp;nbsp; drfiler1_aggr0_50tb / drfiler2_aggr0_50tb, and have the snapmirrors for filer1 going to drfiler1 and filer2's snapmirrors going to drfiler2 in case there ever was a DR situation (probably never but hey) theres some load balancing of the resources of the controllers. I then have set the snapvaults to go to the alternate drfiler, which is probably slightly excessive, but then the snapvault is on a different aggr to its snapmirror for additional resiliency. I have plenty of space to play with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also I see the individual qtree protected and the volume protected as two seperate snapvault relationships. Is this normal, I'm not seeing data being copied twice per volume / unnecessary workload on the filer am I? Not played with Snapvault extensively enough to know what I should be seeing, as normally you protect qtrees, but I'm not specifying what qtree to backup inside snapprotect.......or can I / should I be doing so???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whats the best way to schedule a snapshot / snapmirror / snapvault job. Ideally I'd like it to just do one after each other as the previous one finishes. If this is an option and I'm just missing on where it is please let me know. Or is it just a case of scheduling each piece of the job manually and hoping they dont overlap. Again schedule policies baffle me a bit, should I be using them, it seems I need schedules to create a schedule policy? Also can I only kick off a primary snap by scheduling each subclient? It seems that way, the documentation seems to do it this way but doesn't say that is the case?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If backing up VMware (with the Primary snap) the Enable Granular Recovery option....I thought by unchecking that it would avoid the excessive flexcloning and mounting of VMs inside VMware but oooh no! Is what I'm seeing inside VMware some sort of basic verify? What is the granular recovery actually doing, is it indexing the vmdk once its mounted and been tested? What is the overhead for this? Can I create an hourly job that doesnt do this (dont say configure NAS snapshots!). Also what is the other option of Create Backup Copy Immediately, with Enable Granular Recovery for backup copy.......is this to do with backup to tape or something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SQL in a VM best practices. I'm struggling to understand how the SQL bit works, not being much of an SQL guy. Anyway would you present RDMs (either vmware pRDMs or via vm guest iscsi maybe?) and treat it as a physical host, or do you leave it inside the vmdk and some sort of other magic happens to backup the DB? Do I need another proxy for this? I'd be very interested to understand how people have gone about this. Also the SQL server I'm talking about is currently a physical cluster with netapp luns, and as far as I can see I'll need a proxy anyway right? Something I am not looking forward to anyway!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exchange seems to be simple enough, my scenario I have exch2007 and two mail stores (no CCR or anything like that thank god). I am going to dump all exchange VMs into its own NFS volume and protect them all in a single policy. For things like the individual mail restore options work do I just install all the agents for exchange server / mining etc on each mail server and that should be ok? Any gotchas / real world best practices you can share?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been through all the NetApp university online courses / have the TR docs / POC cookbook and am trawling through the web / online documentation, but its very slow so far as its a pretty complex beast, so any comments and suggestions are most welcome. Just trying to find other peoples example storage policies for some sort of reference seem to be impossible, it would be nice to see some scenarios where a SnapManager product did it this way, this is how you'd do it in SnapProtect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks guys.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:03:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>l_mitchell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-18T13:03:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15497#M3487</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may have seen the latest announcement for our new product, SnapProtect.&amp;nbsp; Please ask your questions - we have technical expertise ready to provide answers and point to useful information.&amp;nbsp; I will post a few questions here as well to break the ice and open up the conversation.&amp;nbsp; For more information about the product, start with our product pages. &lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com/us/products/protection-software/snapprotect.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/products/protection-software/snapprotect.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Terri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15497#M3487</guid>
      <dc:creator>peluso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-18T11:04:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15501#M3488</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've tried to read the documentation and at some point I sort of drowned in the marketing bla-bla.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically, this is a re-branding of mostly existing functionality and some things that most of us probably wished for for many years from DFM/OM as Storage (and Backup) administrators. (I don't blame anyone... companies like EMC make tons just changing the names of things and adding some fireworks)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why the split?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why is NetApp making more disparate products instead of a real "single pane" management system?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've been wishing for end-to-end data management of NetApp NAS/SAN for years, from NFS/CIFS/LUN to secondary (tertiary) mirrors and on to tape, essentially SLA monitoring. What I have seen and tried to use from DFM/OM has been a source of great frustration and a full implementation was so riddled with technical hurdles that it was simply left to decay.&amp;nbsp; Where is the "single pane" for storage administration? Integration of SAN administration/monitoring?&amp;nbsp; Integration with backup systems?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will any of this integrate with DFM/OM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What we have here is a server backup solution that involves as much NetApp equipment and software as possible.&amp;nbsp; I don't want to rain on anybody's parade here, but I'd be more excited if this looked like an extension of current management tools (that could possibly sold separately) that was working towards a "single pane" (not that I like that marketing term either... ) solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 21:10:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15501#M3488</guid>
      <dc:creator>shaunjurr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-31T21:10:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15506#M3490</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is Ontap 8.x supported ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is indexing of NAS data in vfilers supported ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are metroclusters supported ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Niek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:37:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15506#M3490</guid>
      <dc:creator>vmsjaak13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T06:37:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15510#M3492</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; If a customer has DFM/OM, is SnapProtect a "free upgrade"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:42:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15510#M3492</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter_lehmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T06:42:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15513#M3493</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Niek,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the questions. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Currently, ONTAP 8.x is not supported with SnapProtect. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- It is not possible to do NAS indexing of a vFiler volume&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- MetroCluster has not completed qualification at this time. Please refer to the Interoperability Matrix on the NetApp support site to find out what's supported today, and check back later for updates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ray&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:54:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15513#M3493</guid>
      <dc:creator>mar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T06:54:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15517#M3495</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ray,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a roadmap available for ONTAP 8.x and MetroCluster support ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Niek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:32:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15517#M3495</guid>
      <dc:creator>vmsjaak13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T07:32:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15522#M3497</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's make it straight here: SnapProtect is just re-badged CommVault Simpana, it's not a secret &amp;amp; can make the whole story easier to digest for many people who are already familiar with this product.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.netapp.com/us/company/news/news-rel-20110531-291587.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/company/news/news-rel-20110531-291587.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/31/netapp_oems_simpana_9/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/31/netapp_oems_simpana_9/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15522#M3497</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T10:51:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15526#M3500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for clarifying my suspicion... &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_macro_emoticon" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek Kubka schrieb:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's make it straight here: SnapProtect is just re-badged CommVault Simpana, it's not a secret &amp;amp; can make the whole story easier to digest for many people who are already familiar with this product.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, this would also answer my question, assuming this is not a free upgrade for DFM/OM customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, yet again another Backup Strategy from NetApp... would be about time to get this topic adressed finally in the right manner...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Backup in DFM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Protection Manager is the answer...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. now SnapProtect is the answer,,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whats next??? &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="confused" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_macro_emoticon" height="1" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/confused.gif" width="1"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15526#M3500</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter_lehmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T11:35:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15531#M3503</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;...and don't forget about SnapCreator which is another (very interesting) topic! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:55:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15531#M3503</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T11:55:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15535#M3506</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; put another dollar in...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;order all new systems with DFM and Protection manager.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;next systems are order'd with complete Snapmanager bundle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and now we have to pay for SnapProtect ???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:00:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15535#M3506</guid>
      <dc:creator>admbranjo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T12:00:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15540#M3508</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just imagine... until now you had to get several SnapManagers (and SnapDrive) and Operations Manager and Protection Manager, and best of all you would still not be able to get everything integrated and connected (e.g. SMVI and SnapVault)... &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="mischief" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/mischief.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the future you just have to buy SnapProtect (or even get Simpana from Commvault) and everything is covered. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="cool" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/cool.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I have a choice, I'll always choose the simple one - do you hear NetApp? &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="shocked" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/shocked.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:09:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15540#M3508</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter_lehmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T12:09:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15547#M3511</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; future...nice, I have all these allready payed products, some of them working but not realy integrated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do i have to do with my older installations?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I have to buy now additional SnapProtect license&lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="confused" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_macro_emoticon" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/confused.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15547#M3511</guid>
      <dc:creator>admbranjo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T12:24:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15553#M3513</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; I have given up getting our snapvault/snapmirror/snapmanager for */snapdrive to work. Even with consultants on the job, we have not managed to get a proper backup of our MS-SQL server since we had it installed in January, protection manager seemed out of focus on which functionalities it wanted to do and I fail to see how it can scale for anything larger than a few servers without having to use tons of time maintaining it and we only have arount 1000 servers(80% virtual). So we have almost already decided to use commvault. Now if I can get it officially and directly from NetApp it's even better and I can't wait to take another look at it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:33:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15553#M3513</guid>
      <dc:creator>martinrudjakobsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T12:33:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15558#M3515</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;SnapProtect is modified to use Snapvault and Snapmirror for backup and replication. I don't think non-branded Simpana can do that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:07:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15558#M3515</guid>
      <dc:creator>sajeev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T14:07:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15563#M3517</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;SnapProtect is modified to use Snapvault and Snapmirror for backup and replication. I don't think non-branded Simpana can do that.&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It can - plus few other tricks, like NDMP &amp;amp; SnapMirror to Tape (SMT): &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.commvault.com/pdf/CV_SolutionBrief_NetApp.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.commvault.com/pdf/CV_SolutionBrief_NetApp.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is a great product though, so actually I don't mind that SnapProtect is just a marketing name &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="cool" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/cool.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15563#M3517</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T14:58:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15566#M3518</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently use SMO, SMVI, and SMSQL - how is this different?&amp;nbsp; Should we switch to SnapProtect?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:14:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15566#M3518</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajaywil2000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T16:14:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15571#M3520</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey gang, @that1guynick here....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the way we see things eventually evolving.&amp;nbsp; Not current, but more future, going forward...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL start="1"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SnapProtect will be positioned as our primary&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tool for backing up solutions running on VMware, Citrix, and enterprise-wide backup opportunities. This includes vCloud Director. &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SnapManager for App X is our&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; primary tools for backing up solutions running on Hyper-V and remaining physical realms.&amp;nbsp; This is not to say SnapProtect cannot tackle physical as well.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SnapCreator is a technology enablement tool, like the Data Ontap PowerShell Toolkit, and will be promoted as a tool that enables one when there are no solutions.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, how does this affect your current DFM/OM environment?&amp;nbsp; You've likely heard about OnCommand.&amp;nbsp; The future of these products are on our public website, and if you're familiar with DFM/OM, you'll recognize a lot of these names and will be able to draw your own conclusions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com/us/products/management-software/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/products/management-software/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Nick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:51:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15571#M3520</guid>
      <dc:creator>datacenterdude</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T17:51:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15574#M3522</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So use SnapProtect as a replacement for SMVI or SMO when you ahve Oracle running as VM's ?&amp;nbsp; Is that correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15574#M3522</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajaywil2000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T18:41:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15579#M3525</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The new SnapProtect TR-3920 has been made public.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3920.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3920.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:44:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15579#M3525</guid>
      <dc:creator>datacenterdude</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T18:44:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15583#M3529</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oracle is a hard example due to people's acceptance of running Oracle in a virtual environment, and Oracle's support stance, but yes, in general, we're hoping that SnapProtect will be the all-in-one solution that bundles everything that SMVI + SMO/E/SQL, and includes cataloguing and other integration points, such as SnapVault and SnapMirror (or both!).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:48:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15583#M3529</guid>
      <dc:creator>datacenterdude</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T18:48:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

