<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: non disruptive failover for cifs session in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/non-disruptive-failover-for-cifs-session/m-p/161424#M36872</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;No, using continuously available share property is unsupported for workloads other than the ones mentioned.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SMB2/3 failover in general will be minimally disruptive by default due to durable handles and other features, so your end users likely won't notice failovers/givebacks in a majority of cases.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:16:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>parisi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-23T18:16:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>non disruptive failover for cifs session</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/non-disruptive-failover-for-cifs-session/m-p/161419#M36871</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I m wondering how i can manage to have non disrutive failover for cifs session.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as i can see i should use continuous availability but i see it s not really good&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;for other things than&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hyper-V over SMB and SQL over SMB.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can i use it for general share like home share?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:44:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/non-disruptive-failover-for-cifs-session/m-p/161419#M36871</guid>
      <dc:creator>grocanar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:44:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: non disruptive failover for cifs session</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/non-disruptive-failover-for-cifs-session/m-p/161424#M36872</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, using continuously available share property is unsupported for workloads other than the ones mentioned.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SMB2/3 failover in general will be minimally disruptive by default due to durable handles and other features, so your end users likely won't notice failovers/givebacks in a majority of cases.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:16:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/non-disruptive-failover-for-cifs-session/m-p/161424#M36872</guid>
      <dc:creator>parisi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-23T18:16:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: non disruptive failover for cifs session</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/non-disruptive-failover-for-cifs-session/m-p/161482#M36884</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As &lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11621"&gt;@parisi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; said - in SMB 2+ we usually don't see an impact. Just make sure the clients indeed use SMB 2+, as things like un-delegated CNAME aliases can get it to fallback to SMB1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CMD:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;vserver cifs session show -vserver &lt;VAR class="keyword varname"&gt;vserver_name&lt;/VAR&gt; -protocol-version &lt;VAR class="keyword varname"&gt;SMB1&lt;/VAR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;or PS:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="pl-c1"&gt;Get-NcCifsSession&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;-&lt;/SPAN&gt;Controller &lt;SPAN class="pl-smi"&gt;$clustersSessions&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;|&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;?&lt;/SPAN&gt; {&lt;SPAN class="pl-c1"&gt;$_&lt;SPAN class="pl-smi"&gt;.ProtocolVersion&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;-eq&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="pl-s"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="pl-pds"&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;smb1&lt;SPAN class="pl-pds"&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;-or&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="pl-c1"&gt;$_&lt;SPAN class="pl-smi"&gt;.AuthMechanism&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;-match&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="pl-s"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="pl-pds"&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;ntlm&lt;SPAN class="pl-pds"&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;} &lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;|&lt;/SPAN&gt; select vserver&lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt;WindowsUser&lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt;Address&lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt;AuthMechanism&lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt;ProtocolVersion &lt;SPAN class="pl-k"&gt;-&lt;/SPAN&gt;Unique&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/non-disruptive-failover-for-cifs-session/m-p/161482#M36884</guid>
      <dc:creator>GidonMarcus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-24T11:06:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

