<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: arl from fas8020 to fas8300 in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162849#M37215</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks for informations and KB. I also used that kb (9.7) for our plan.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not have switches, planing to use ha port for temp which is fas8300 e0a and e0b . After ı completed headupgrade ı will migrate cluster lifs to 100GbE port .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:05:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tuncay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-12T17:05:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>arl from fas8020 to fas8300</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162846#M37212</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am planning to perform head upgrade from fas8020 to fas8300. but cluster ports in fas8300 are 100GbE but fas8020 are 10GbE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked old posts and found the same question and post owner asked to use ha interconnect port which is support 10GbE. (&lt;A href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-a300-to-a400/m-p/159922" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-a300-to-a400/m-p/159922&lt;/A&gt;) My question is same but I am wondering there is no information about this issue. The KB I'm using, is saying fas8020 support upgrade to fas8300 but the is no additional information about this. (For example; fas8020 to fas8300 can temporarily use ha interconnect for cluster connection)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:39:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162846#M37212</guid>
      <dc:creator>tuncay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:39:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: arl from fas8020 to fas8300</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162847#M37213</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;been a while since I have done an ARL. Some things to consider&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Have you upgraded or are you using a "high-speed" (40/100 capable for nodes) switches?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. If not, have you acquire the appropriate 4x10G cards for your FAS8300s? They do not support breakout from the FAS side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3.During the process, there is a point where you are able to modify ports for Cluster service. At this point you can chance the ports to reflect what you need&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:54:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162847#M37213</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMACMD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-12T16:54:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: arl from fas8020 to fas8300</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162848#M37214</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This document, starting at page 55&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMLP2875250" target="_blank"&gt;Using Aggregate Relocation to Manually Upgrade Controller Hardware Running ONTAP 9.7 or Earlier (netapp.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For a little more simplicity, if you can, maybe even upgrade to ONTAP 9.8 (automatic port-placement)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMLP2659356" target="_blank"&gt;Using Aggregate Relocation to Manually Upgrade Controller Hardware (netapp.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162848#M37214</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMACMD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-12T16:59:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: arl from fas8020 to fas8300</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162849#M37215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks for informations and KB. I also used that kb (9.7) for our plan.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not have switches, planing to use ha port for temp which is fas8300 e0a and e0b . After ı completed headupgrade ı will migrate cluster lifs to 100GbE port .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:05:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162849#M37215</guid>
      <dc:creator>tuncay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-12T17:05:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: arl from fas8020 to fas8300</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162850#M37216</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;no switches is usually easier. less to deal with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Always cable new unit correctly. e0a/e0b are HA and HA only.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For a temporary purpose...you might be able to use e0e/e0f/e0g/e0h (pick two, like e0e/e0g) ports as 10G for cluster ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the migration is done, add the 100G ports to the cluster, let stabilize, then remove the 10G ports and re-use for data as 10G or even 25G ports.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162850#M37216</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMACMD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-12T17:17:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: arl from fas8020 to fas8300</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162851#M37217</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;your suggestion make sense but in my demo environment I had problem about cluster ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In demo env, I upgraded from fas8020 to fas2552(no internal drive) but one controller completing without problem. After ı select options 6 ( Update flash from backup config), I modify new cluster ports and then migrate cluster lif to new cluster port with no problem. But in second node ı also modied cluster port but when I checked lifs, output just show management lif. I tried to use migrate but it gave error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After some diggig ı found another solution. before I halt second old node, modfiying cluster port which exists on new node. After then when I attached the cable and boot new node, it is opening with that config and has no problem to connect cluster.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the end why ı want to use ha interconnect(e0a and e0b) in Fas8300 for cluster port, because it is same cluster port in fas8020(e0a&amp;nbsp; and e0b).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162851#M37217</guid>
      <dc:creator>tuncay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-12T17:29:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: arl from fas8020 to fas8300</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162852#M37218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;attached both node cluster port modification.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:40:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162852#M37218</guid>
      <dc:creator>tuncay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-12T17:40:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: arl from fas8020 to fas8300</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162853#M37219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't think that will work. INTERNALLY, ONTAP treats them differently.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On that platform, you can never use them for anything but HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Look at the other platforms: they use an internal HA (your FAS8200/FAS80x0) use the backplane for HA. Not configurable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Those&amp;nbsp; HA ports are not configurable. You cannot use them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You either need to get a supported 4x10G NIC for cluster on the FAS8300 or try like I suggested and use 2 of the 4x10/25G onboard ports as a crutch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:44:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162853#M37219</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMACMD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-12T17:44:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: arl from fas8020 to fas8300</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162854#M37220</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In that case, it looks like the second node has no cluster ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would have create d two new cluster LIFs&amp;nbsp; on e0e/e0f and be done&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:48:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162854#M37220</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMACMD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-12T17:48:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: arl from fas8020 to fas8300</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162855#M37221</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is very simple but amazing solution. I was stuck to doc, could not think to create cluster lif.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the great answer , ı will try and let you know tomorrow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:06:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162855#M37221</guid>
      <dc:creator>tuncay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-12T18:06:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: arl from fas8020 to fas8300</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162919#M37235</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Like you said I tried to create cluster lif but it gave an error because it can not communicate to cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I attached the logs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:09:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/arl-from-fas8020-to-fas8300/m-p/162919#M37235</guid>
      <dc:creator>tuncay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-14T11:09:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

