<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Flexgroup aggregate best practice in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Flexgroup-aggregate-best-practice/m-p/164302#M37600</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As per Tr-4571 best practice for a FAS based flexgroup is 2 aggregates per node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would be the conequences of adding a 3rd aggregate per node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Environment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6 node FAS8200 cluster 3x DS460C shelves per pair loaded with 10TB drives&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTAP 9.7P5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 data aggregates per node ~288TB per aggr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aggregates are 42x 10TB drives 12 drive RAID-TEC raid groups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4 member volumes per aggr, ~68TB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so far so comforming to the Tr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Single flexgroup spans the cluster and is approaching 95% full&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Customer has additional shelves available and would like to expand the flexgroup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adding an aggregate breaks the 2 per node best practice rule&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adding a raid group breaks the 400TB aggr size limit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So without adding nodes what would the implications be of adding a 3rd aggregate per node.&amp;nbsp; I'm loath to break best practice&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:33:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>STEVEWILLSQ</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:33:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Flexgroup aggregate best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Flexgroup-aggregate-best-practice/m-p/164302#M37600</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As per Tr-4571 best practice for a FAS based flexgroup is 2 aggregates per node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would be the conequences of adding a 3rd aggregate per node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Environment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6 node FAS8200 cluster 3x DS460C shelves per pair loaded with 10TB drives&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTAP 9.7P5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 data aggregates per node ~288TB per aggr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aggregates are 42x 10TB drives 12 drive RAID-TEC raid groups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4 member volumes per aggr, ~68TB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so far so comforming to the Tr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Single flexgroup spans the cluster and is approaching 95% full&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Customer has additional shelves available and would like to expand the flexgroup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adding an aggregate breaks the 2 per node best practice rule&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adding a raid group breaks the 400TB aggr size limit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So without adding nodes what would the implications be of adding a 3rd aggregate per node.&amp;nbsp; I'm loath to break best practice&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:33:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Flexgroup-aggregate-best-practice/m-p/164302#M37600</guid>
      <dc:creator>STEVEWILLSQ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:33:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flexgroup aggregate best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Flexgroup-aggregate-best-practice/m-p/164347#M37604</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No real consequence. The best practice is based on the number of aggregate affinities available in ONTAP; there are only two aggregate affinities per node. Adding a third aggregate doesn't add more affinities so no perf gain. You do get capacity gains however.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:07:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Flexgroup-aggregate-best-practice/m-p/164347#M37604</guid>
      <dc:creator>parisi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-24T15:07:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flexgroup aggregate best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Flexgroup-aggregate-best-practice/m-p/164348#M37605</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;great to know,&amp;nbsp; thanks for the responding so quickly!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:11:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Flexgroup-aggregate-best-practice/m-p/164348#M37605</guid>
      <dc:creator>STEVEWILLSQ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-24T15:11:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

