https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FabricPool-source-volume-for-SnapMirror-Asynchronous/m-p/164447#M37615 <P>Hi Team,</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Would there be any problems with this? The idea is to have 30 days of snapshots on both the primary and the secondary site, but the primary has an AFF tiering with a Snapshot-Only policy to a FAS object tier and the secondary is a FAS8200. Since SnapMirror is only sending changes, I'm assuming that the replication engine wouldn't have any issues with the cold data blocks in the object tier, but I want to make sure.&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Thanks!</P> Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:33:30 GMT Roland_Yu 2025-06-04T10:33:30Z https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FabricPool-source-volume-for-SnapMirror-Asynchronous/m-p/164447#M37615 <P>Hi Team,</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Would there be any problems with this? The idea is to have 30 days of snapshots on both the primary and the secondary site, but the primary has an AFF tiering with a Snapshot-Only policy to a FAS object tier and the secondary is a FAS8200. Since SnapMirror is only sending changes, I'm assuming that the replication engine wouldn't have any issues with the cold data blocks in the object tier, but I want to make sure.&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Thanks!</P> Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:33:30 GMT https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FabricPool-source-volume-for-SnapMirror-Asynchronous/m-p/164447#M37615 Roland_Yu 2025-06-04T10:33:30Z https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FabricPool-source-volume-for-SnapMirror-Asynchronous/m-p/164514#M37625 <P>Correct. Supported configuration. However, there may be slowness reading from the cold tier on source side. Please plan accordingly for that when designing your storage setup.</P> Mon, 01 Mar 2021 16:41:57 GMT https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FabricPool-source-volume-for-SnapMirror-Asynchronous/m-p/164514#M37625 paul_stejskal 2021-03-01T16:41:57Z