<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: x710  HBA in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/x710-HBA/m-p/165570#M37844</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;for CNA we normally refer to adapters which can do both Ethernet and FC (as well as FCoE) but the X710 seems Ethernet only and I believe this is the reason why we don't have it in our matrix.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can use the feedback feature of the matrix to contact the team responsible for it and have them verify this information.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:10:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>maffo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-01T13:10:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>x710  HBA</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/x710-HBA/m-p/165499#M37819</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm beginning the process of upgrading from Data Ontap 9.4 to&amp;nbsp; 9.5 (and beyond), but the IMT shows no support for our two main HBA cards running our ESXi 6.7 and Windows 2016&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any experience with following adapters and controller versions relating to Data Ontap support?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HPE ethernet 10GB 2-port 562SFP+ adapter&lt;BR /&gt;Intel x710-DA2 Adapter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel Ethernet Controller X710&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:28:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/x710-HBA/m-p/165499#M37819</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ssmartodd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:28:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: x710  HBA</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/x710-HBA/m-p/165562#M37838</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Interoperability matrix is usually for FC HBAs, while X710 is a normal Ethernet adapter if I'm not mistaken.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this is the case, there is no compatibility matrix for normal Ethernet NICs and everything should work through upgrades.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are those NICs connected to a switch or directly to the controller ports?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 12:24:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/x710-HBA/m-p/165562#M37838</guid>
      <dc:creator>maffo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-01T12:24:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: x710  HBA</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/x710-HBA/m-p/165567#M37842</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They are CNA nics and are connected to our Aruba 5400zl 10GbE switch. They've been up and running for over a year now without issue.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:03:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/x710-HBA/m-p/165567#M37842</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ssmartodd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-01T13:03:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: x710  HBA</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/x710-HBA/m-p/165570#M37844</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;for CNA we normally refer to adapters which can do both Ethernet and FC (as well as FCoE) but the X710 seems Ethernet only and I believe this is the reason why we don't have it in our matrix.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can use the feedback feature of the matrix to contact the team responsible for it and have them verify this information.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:10:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/x710-HBA/m-p/165570#M37844</guid>
      <dc:creator>maffo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-01T13:10:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

