<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SnapProtect questions in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/16255#M3785</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;024 4132 09/30 08:08:27 ########################################################################### &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:27 ##&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Installation STARTED&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ## &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:27 ##&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Version 10.0.0(BUILD116)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ## &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:27 ########################################################################### &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:27 Command Line : D:\WinX64\Setup.exe &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:27 Setup detected that previous installation was not finished. CheckPoint registry exists. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:27 DVD information: [Label: DVD1, Edition: NetApp Edition, ServicePack: 0, RecutNumber: 0, TimeStamp: Thu Aug 15 2013 22:31:03] &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:27 This is Windows 2008 R2 or Windows 7 or higher version. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:27 Machine information: [Short name: dfm, FQDN: dfm] &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:27 Phase: Launch &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:27 Initializing NetApp Installer. Please wait... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:28 This is Windows 2008 R2 or Windows 7 or higher version. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:28 This is a resume. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:34 Dialog: Unfinished installation detected: User answer: Cleanup unfinished installation and start over &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:34 You must complete the upgrade process before you can use this software.&amp;nbsp; You can resume the upgrade at another time. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 Setting N_INSTALL_EXTENDED_ERROR_CODE to EXIT_CODE_UNFINISHED_INSTALL_DETECTED. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 gbPreviousInstallSessionDetected=1, bResume=0, bSaveGalaxyInstallerRegistry=0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 bAllowCleanupInstall=0, bCorrectSilentModeToCleanup=0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 | End | Setup | Installation Not Complete&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 GalaxyIntaller registry key dumped to C:\ProgramData\Commvault Systems\Galaxy\LogFiles\GalaxyInstaller_Reg_Complete_Tree.txt &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 | START | Leaving Setup&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 This is the last log message before copying log files to Galaxy Log Folder. Please see rest of log file under: C:\ProgramData\Commvault Systems\Galaxy\LogFiles\Instance001\2013-09-27 23-26\ &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 Setup is copying log files... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 ########################################################################### &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 ##&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Installation EXITING (1)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ## &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 ########################################################################### &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5024 4132 09/30 08:08:39 Setup.exe end with code = 1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 This is Windows 2008 R2 or Windows 7 or higher version. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 ########################################################################### &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 ##&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Installation STARTED&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ## &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 ##&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Version 10.0.0(BUILD116)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ## &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 ########################################################################### &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 Command Line : D:\WinX64\Setup.exe &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 Setup detected that previous installation was not finished. CheckPoint registry exists. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 DVD information: [Label: DVD1, Edition: NetApp Edition, ServicePack: 0, RecutNumber: 0, TimeStamp: Thu Aug 15 2013 22:31:03] &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 This is Windows 2008 R2 or Windows 7 or higher version. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 Machine information: [Short name: dfm, FQDN: dfm] &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 Phase: Launch &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:49 Initializing NetApp Installer. Please wait... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:50 This is Windows 2008 R2 or Windows 7 or higher version. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:50 This is a resume. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 Dialog: Unfinished installation detected: User answer: Resume unfinished installation &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 This is not a laptop package. Not creating the auto resumability installer task. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 Phase: Check third party software requirements &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 No reboot required because there are no relevant pending files to rename. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 Phase: Check third party software requirements (File System Core) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 | SKIP | Phase02_Requirements | WindowsFileSystemiDataAgentCore&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 Phase: Check third party software requirements (CommServe) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 | SKIP | Phase02_Requirements | CommServe&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 Phase: Check third party software requirements (CommCell Console) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 | SKIP | Phase02_Requirements | CommCellConsole&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 Phase: Check third party software requirements (MediaAgent) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 | SKIP | Phase02_Requirements | MediaAgent&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 Phase: Check third party software requirements (Windows File System) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 | SKIP | Phase02_Requirements | WindowsFileSystemiDataAgentAdvanced&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 Phase: Check third party software requirements (Java Runtime Environment 1.7.0_17) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 Newest JRE required so far is 1.7.0_17 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 Executing "C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe" /C "java.exe -version 2&amp;gt; "C:\ProgramData\Commvault Systems\Galaxy\LogFiles\Instance001\2013-09-27 23-26\JreVersion.txt"" &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 JRE version installed 1.6.0_29 is older than required version 1.7.0_17 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 jusched.exe is NOT running &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:58 jucheck.exe is NOT running &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:59 AskYesNo :: Default = NO &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:08:59 WARNING:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order to install a new Java Runtime Environment, the current Java Virtual Machine must not be in use.&amp;nbsp; The processes below are running and need to be shut down to allow for a successful install of the JRE. Please close the applications which are using these processes and Click OK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;java.exe &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:11:15 User selected YES &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:11:15 Did not detect common JVM processes &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:11:15 Executing process : "C:\Windows\system32\msiexec.exe" /i "D:\WinX64\Bin\jre\jre1.7.0_17.msi" /qn IEXPLORER=1 REBOOT=Suppress WEBSTRATICON=0 /L*v "C:\ProgramData\Commvault Systems\Galaxy\LogFiles\Instance001\2013-09-27 23-26\jre-7u17-windows-x64.log" METHOD=joff &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:11:15 Installing Java Runtime Environment.&amp;nbsp; Please wait... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:11:16 There are some failure in JRE install. Please verify the log: C:\ProgramData\Commvault Systems\Galaxy\LogFiles\Instance001\2013-09-27 23-26\jre-7u17-windows-x64.log &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:11:16 Setup found the JRE installed on this machine is corrupted. Please install it manually from here:[D:\WinX64\Bin\JRE\jre1.7.0_17.msi] After JRE is successfully installed, click Setup and resume the installation. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:11:16 Setup found the JRE installed on this machine is corrupted. Please install it manually from here:[D:\WinX64\Bin\JRE\jre1.7.0_17.msi] After JRE is successfully installed, click Setup and resume the installation. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:12:04 JRE Requirements Phase aborted ... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:12:04 Requirements Phase aborted... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4144 4824 09/30 08:12:04 Please note that this installation session is not yet complete. The installation may be resumed by restarting SETUP.EXE. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>brianchama</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-30T06:13:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15497#M3487</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may have seen the latest announcement for our new product, SnapProtect.&amp;nbsp; Please ask your questions - we have technical expertise ready to provide answers and point to useful information.&amp;nbsp; I will post a few questions here as well to break the ice and open up the conversation.&amp;nbsp; For more information about the product, start with our product pages. &lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com/us/products/protection-software/snapprotect.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/products/protection-software/snapprotect.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Terri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15497#M3487</guid>
      <dc:creator>peluso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-18T11:04:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15501#M3488</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've tried to read the documentation and at some point I sort of drowned in the marketing bla-bla.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically, this is a re-branding of mostly existing functionality and some things that most of us probably wished for for many years from DFM/OM as Storage (and Backup) administrators. (I don't blame anyone... companies like EMC make tons just changing the names of things and adding some fireworks)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why the split?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why is NetApp making more disparate products instead of a real "single pane" management system?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've been wishing for end-to-end data management of NetApp NAS/SAN for years, from NFS/CIFS/LUN to secondary (tertiary) mirrors and on to tape, essentially SLA monitoring. What I have seen and tried to use from DFM/OM has been a source of great frustration and a full implementation was so riddled with technical hurdles that it was simply left to decay.&amp;nbsp; Where is the "single pane" for storage administration? Integration of SAN administration/monitoring?&amp;nbsp; Integration with backup systems?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will any of this integrate with DFM/OM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What we have here is a server backup solution that involves as much NetApp equipment and software as possible.&amp;nbsp; I don't want to rain on anybody's parade here, but I'd be more excited if this looked like an extension of current management tools (that could possibly sold separately) that was working towards a "single pane" (not that I like that marketing term either... ) solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 21:10:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15501#M3488</guid>
      <dc:creator>shaunjurr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-31T21:10:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15506#M3490</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is Ontap 8.x supported ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is indexing of NAS data in vfilers supported ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are metroclusters supported ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Niek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:37:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15506#M3490</guid>
      <dc:creator>vmsjaak13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T06:37:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15510#M3492</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; If a customer has DFM/OM, is SnapProtect a "free upgrade"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:42:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15510#M3492</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter_lehmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T06:42:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15513#M3493</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Niek,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the questions. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Currently, ONTAP 8.x is not supported with SnapProtect. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- It is not possible to do NAS indexing of a vFiler volume&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- MetroCluster has not completed qualification at this time. Please refer to the Interoperability Matrix on the NetApp support site to find out what's supported today, and check back later for updates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ray&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:54:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15513#M3493</guid>
      <dc:creator>mar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T06:54:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15517#M3495</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ray,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a roadmap available for ONTAP 8.x and MetroCluster support ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Niek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:32:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15517#M3495</guid>
      <dc:creator>vmsjaak13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T07:32:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15522#M3497</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's make it straight here: SnapProtect is just re-badged CommVault Simpana, it's not a secret &amp;amp; can make the whole story easier to digest for many people who are already familiar with this product.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.netapp.com/us/company/news/news-rel-20110531-291587.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/company/news/news-rel-20110531-291587.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/31/netapp_oems_simpana_9/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/31/netapp_oems_simpana_9/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15522#M3497</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T10:51:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15526#M3500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for clarifying my suspicion... &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_macro_emoticon" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek Kubka schrieb:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's make it straight here: SnapProtect is just re-badged CommVault Simpana, it's not a secret &amp;amp; can make the whole story easier to digest for many people who are already familiar with this product.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, this would also answer my question, assuming this is not a free upgrade for DFM/OM customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, yet again another Backup Strategy from NetApp... would be about time to get this topic adressed finally in the right manner...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Backup in DFM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Protection Manager is the answer...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. now SnapProtect is the answer,,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whats next??? &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="confused" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_macro_emoticon" height="1" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/confused.gif" width="1"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15526#M3500</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter_lehmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T11:35:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15531#M3503</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;...and don't forget about SnapCreator which is another (very interesting) topic! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:55:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15531#M3503</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T11:55:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15535#M3506</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; put another dollar in...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;order all new systems with DFM and Protection manager.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;next systems are order'd with complete Snapmanager bundle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and now we have to pay for SnapProtect ???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:00:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15535#M3506</guid>
      <dc:creator>admbranjo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T12:00:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15540#M3508</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just imagine... until now you had to get several SnapManagers (and SnapDrive) and Operations Manager and Protection Manager, and best of all you would still not be able to get everything integrated and connected (e.g. SMVI and SnapVault)... &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="mischief" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/mischief.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the future you just have to buy SnapProtect (or even get Simpana from Commvault) and everything is covered. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="cool" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/cool.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I have a choice, I'll always choose the simple one - do you hear NetApp? &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="shocked" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/shocked.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:09:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15540#M3508</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter_lehmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T12:09:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15547#M3511</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; future...nice, I have all these allready payed products, some of them working but not realy integrated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do i have to do with my older installations?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I have to buy now additional SnapProtect license&lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="confused" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_macro_emoticon" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/confused.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15547#M3511</guid>
      <dc:creator>admbranjo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T12:24:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15553#M3513</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; I have given up getting our snapvault/snapmirror/snapmanager for */snapdrive to work. Even with consultants on the job, we have not managed to get a proper backup of our MS-SQL server since we had it installed in January, protection manager seemed out of focus on which functionalities it wanted to do and I fail to see how it can scale for anything larger than a few servers without having to use tons of time maintaining it and we only have arount 1000 servers(80% virtual). So we have almost already decided to use commvault. Now if I can get it officially and directly from NetApp it's even better and I can't wait to take another look at it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:33:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15553#M3513</guid>
      <dc:creator>martinrudjakobsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T12:33:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15558#M3515</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;SnapProtect is modified to use Snapvault and Snapmirror for backup and replication. I don't think non-branded Simpana can do that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:07:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15558#M3515</guid>
      <dc:creator>sajeev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T14:07:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15563#M3517</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;SnapProtect is modified to use Snapvault and Snapmirror for backup and replication. I don't think non-branded Simpana can do that.&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It can - plus few other tricks, like NDMP &amp;amp; SnapMirror to Tape (SMT): &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.commvault.com/pdf/CV_SolutionBrief_NetApp.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.commvault.com/pdf/CV_SolutionBrief_NetApp.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is a great product though, so actually I don't mind that SnapProtect is just a marketing name &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="cool" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/cool.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15563#M3517</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T14:58:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15566#M3518</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently use SMO, SMVI, and SMSQL - how is this different?&amp;nbsp; Should we switch to SnapProtect?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:14:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15566#M3518</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajaywil2000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T16:14:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15571#M3520</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey gang, @that1guynick here....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the way we see things eventually evolving.&amp;nbsp; Not current, but more future, going forward...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL start="1"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SnapProtect will be positioned as our primary&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tool for backing up solutions running on VMware, Citrix, and enterprise-wide backup opportunities. This includes vCloud Director. &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SnapManager for App X is our&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; primary tools for backing up solutions running on Hyper-V and remaining physical realms.&amp;nbsp; This is not to say SnapProtect cannot tackle physical as well.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SnapCreator is a technology enablement tool, like the Data Ontap PowerShell Toolkit, and will be promoted as a tool that enables one when there are no solutions.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, how does this affect your current DFM/OM environment?&amp;nbsp; You've likely heard about OnCommand.&amp;nbsp; The future of these products are on our public website, and if you're familiar with DFM/OM, you'll recognize a lot of these names and will be able to draw your own conclusions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com/us/products/management-software/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/products/management-software/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Nick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:51:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15571#M3520</guid>
      <dc:creator>datacenterdude</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T17:51:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15574#M3522</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So use SnapProtect as a replacement for SMVI or SMO when you ahve Oracle running as VM's ?&amp;nbsp; Is that correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15574#M3522</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajaywil2000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T18:41:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15579#M3525</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The new SnapProtect TR-3920 has been made public.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3920.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3920.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:44:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15579#M3525</guid>
      <dc:creator>datacenterdude</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T18:44:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SnapProtect questions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15583#M3529</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oracle is a hard example due to people's acceptance of running Oracle in a virtual environment, and Oracle's support stance, but yes, in general, we're hoping that SnapProtect will be the all-in-one solution that bundles everything that SMVI + SMO/E/SQL, and includes cataloguing and other integration points, such as SnapVault and SnapMirror (or both!).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:48:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapProtect-questions/m-p/15583#M3529</guid>
      <dc:creator>datacenterdude</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-01T18:48:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

