<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NetApp 2020 volume size. in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-2020-volume-size/m-p/16752#M3931</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi and welcome to the communities! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.6/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you running ONTAP 7.3.x? if that's the case then you can have maximum of 19x 1TB data drives per aggregate (&lt;A href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel73/html/ontap/rnote/rel_notes/reference/r_oc_rn_feat73_aggr-size-max-drives.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel73/html/ontap/rnote/rel_notes/reference/r_oc_rn_feat73_aggr-size-max-drives.html&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is your filer single-controller, not active-active? Then your setup can look as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;19 data drives + 4 parity drives + 3 hot-spares = 26 drives&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IF you are not planning to use deduplication, then your volume can be as big as the containing aggregate, i.e. ~16TB. Otherwise you are limited to 1TB size for a duplicated volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:33:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-12T12:33:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NetApp 2020 volume size.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-2020-volume-size/m-p/16747#M3929</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi i am putting together a solution in the UK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are a hedge fund and i need file level with one volume of 10Tb.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can i put a NetApp 2020 with 12x1Tb drives and a DS14 drive shelf and create a volume that spans both of these?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If not what are my options in getting these 10Tb single volume?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:14:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-2020-volume-size/m-p/16747#M3929</guid>
      <dc:creator>chopchop16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:14:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp 2020 volume size.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-2020-volume-size/m-p/16752#M3931</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi and welcome to the communities! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.6/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you running ONTAP 7.3.x? if that's the case then you can have maximum of 19x 1TB data drives per aggregate (&lt;A href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel73/html/ontap/rnote/rel_notes/reference/r_oc_rn_feat73_aggr-size-max-drives.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel73/html/ontap/rnote/rel_notes/reference/r_oc_rn_feat73_aggr-size-max-drives.html&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is your filer single-controller, not active-active? Then your setup can look as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;19 data drives + 4 parity drives + 3 hot-spares = 26 drives&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IF you are not planning to use deduplication, then your volume can be as big as the containing aggregate, i.e. ~16TB. Otherwise you are limited to 1TB size for a duplicated volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:33:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-2020-volume-size/m-p/16752#M3931</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-12T12:33:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp 2020 volume size.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-2020-volume-size/m-p/16758#M3935</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe it will be 7.3.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However i forgot to add that the USEABLE space needs to be 10Tb and not the RAW space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will also be dual controller.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So am i right to assume that using the standard RAID DP that the 16Tb RAW you mentioned will be cut down to less than 10Tb.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am i also right in saying the only way i can achieve a single 10Tb useable volume is by putting in a 2040 and running ONTAP 8.0?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:58:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-2020-volume-size/m-p/16758#M3935</guid>
      <dc:creator>chopchop16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-12T12:58:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp 2020 volume size.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-2020-volume-size/m-p/16763#M3939</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you are dealing with dual-controller box, you need a different disk allocation:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Controller A: 17 data drives + 4 parity drives + 2 hot-spares = 23 drives&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Controller B: 2 drives in RAID-4 for root aggregate &amp;amp;root&amp;nbsp; volume + 1 hot spare = 3 drives (that's bare minimum - you can assign more, but then your aggregate on Controller A will get smaller)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So let's try to estimate how much usable capacity you'll get out of 17x 1TB data drives:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- right-sized 1TB drive =&amp;gt; 828GB of space (base 2 calculation, not base 10)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -10% WAFL overhead =&amp;gt;745GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -5% default aggregate snap reserve (can be disabled though) =&amp;gt; 708GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally: 17x708GB =12,036GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And then you can decide whether to stick or not to a default 20% volume snap reserve.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 13:55:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-2020-volume-size/m-p/16763#M3939</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-12T13:55:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp 2020 volume size.</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-2020-volume-size/m-p/16767#M3943</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to make sure we understand the scenario...what's driving the 10 TB usable requirement? (some further information there might help with providing suggestions/alternatives)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, if you can do just under 10 TB usable, then you could do a single RAID group of 16 disks -- turns out to be right at 9.9 TB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 19:59:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-2020-volume-size/m-p/16767#M3943</guid>
      <dc:creator>amiller_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-15T19:59:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

