<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Namemapping in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Namemapping/m-p/171985#M39543</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As per the 'Consideration 3' in the following Kb, yes it will work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/Advice_and_Troubleshooting/Data_Storage_Software/ONTAP_OS/Important_considerations_when_setting_up_CIFS_and_name-mapping_in_clustered_Data_ONTAP" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/Advice_and_Troubleshooting/Data_Storage_Software/ONTAP_OS/Important_considerations_when_setting_up_CIFS_and_name-mapping_in_clustered_Data_ONTAP&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To be honest, User-mapping can work perfectly well without any entries in the vServer name-mapping tables "&lt;STRONG&gt;provided both Windows and UNIX user names match&lt;/STRONG&gt;". Then mapping will be transparent as default user mapping will be leveraged.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:50:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ontapforrum</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-26T09:50:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Namemapping</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Namemapping/m-p/171981#M39540</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does name mapping work if I don't mention mixed type&amp;nbsp; security style ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:08:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Namemapping/m-p/171981#M39540</guid>
      <dc:creator>sairajeev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:08:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Namemapping</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Namemapping/m-p/171985#M39543</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As per the 'Consideration 3' in the following Kb, yes it will work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/Advice_and_Troubleshooting/Data_Storage_Software/ONTAP_OS/Important_considerations_when_setting_up_CIFS_and_name-mapping_in_clustered_Data_ONTAP" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/Advice_and_Troubleshooting/Data_Storage_Software/ONTAP_OS/Important_considerations_when_setting_up_CIFS_and_name-mapping_in_clustered_Data_ONTAP&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To be honest, User-mapping can work perfectly well without any entries in the vServer name-mapping tables "&lt;STRONG&gt;provided both Windows and UNIX user names match&lt;/STRONG&gt;". Then mapping will be transparent as default user mapping will be leveraged.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:50:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Namemapping/m-p/171985#M39543</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ontapforrum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-26T09:50:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

