<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RDM in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/RDM/m-p/436844#M40982</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Don't recall it ever happening like that in VMware, but i've seen it in other hypervisors.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Usually related to either having way to may paths. (like 1000+ to each host). and incompatibility interoperability across the stack.&amp;nbsp; i.e. ONTAP was decently currently version, so was the hypervisor, but FC switches were way out of date.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Have you opened a support case with either NetApp and/or the Hypervisor?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 15:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SpindleNinja</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-21T15:02:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RDM</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/RDM/m-p/436825#M40978</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello community. I work in a shop that has Vsphere and Netapp. I am involved in upgrading a to new hardware all the way round. My question current environment uses RDMs... I there a reason why i would want to continue this trend or just convert them to a VMDKs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:58:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/RDM/m-p/436825#M40978</guid>
      <dc:creator>alacard052022</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T09:58:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RDM</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/RDM/m-p/436828#M40979</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Few reasons I can think of...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're wanting to move away from block,&amp;nbsp; you need to migrate off RDMs.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And.. it could also depend on the size of the disk(s).&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;i.e. how big of a VMDK do you want to manage?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;For example... Back when I was an admin, we had a rule of thumb that anything over 1TB was an RDM and anything less was a VMDK.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 19:29:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/RDM/m-p/436828#M40979</guid>
      <dc:creator>SpindleNinja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-20T19:29:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RDM</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/RDM/m-p/436829#M40980</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You could also migrate them to iscsi LUNs connected directly to the vm.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then if the vm needs to migrate, the iscsi lun will too since it is connected via ip&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 20:24:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/RDM/m-p/436829#M40980</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMACMD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-20T20:24:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RDM</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/RDM/m-p/436842#M40981</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply. That sounds like a really good plan. I have a few that are at 1tb and a lot that are under by a lot.&amp;nbsp; Where will still be using block so I think that will work moving forward.&amp;nbsp; Also in your experience if you have ever been down this road. Had a guest os all of the sudden lose access to RDM. In Disk management&amp;nbsp; you could see the disk on a offline / unallocated state.&amp;nbsp; Is there any way to recover it or make the guest os recognize it?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 13:29:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/RDM/m-p/436842#M40981</guid>
      <dc:creator>alacard052022</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-21T13:29:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RDM</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/RDM/m-p/436844#M40982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Don't recall it ever happening like that in VMware, but i've seen it in other hypervisors.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Usually related to either having way to may paths. (like 1000+ to each host). and incompatibility interoperability across the stack.&amp;nbsp; i.e. ONTAP was decently currently version, so was the hypervisor, but FC switches were way out of date.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Have you opened a support case with either NetApp and/or the Hypervisor?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 15:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/RDM/m-p/436844#M40982</guid>
      <dc:creator>SpindleNinja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-21T15:02:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

