<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: mirroring protection for critical application in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/mirroring-protection-for-critical-application/m-p/443858#M42129</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Managing risk vs failure domains is a question of money and technology. Load balancing isn't what you're looking for. Snapmirror Business Continuity to another HA is probably the easiest option to implement at a storage level. Have a read of the TR for more information -&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.netapp.com/media/21888-tr-4878.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.netapp.com/media/21888-tr-4878.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 02:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-28T02:08:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>mirroring protection for critical application</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/mirroring-protection-for-critical-application/m-p/443833#M42128</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;we have a critical application, currently we have multiple data copies on application level but they are all located at same NetApp node /aggregate. I am thinking we may need a mirroring to a different node/aggregate in case of storage node failures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the application is using block based devices from&amp;nbsp; NetApp. what type of mirroring should we use, load balance mirroring or something else? i believe the mirroring should be on volume level. can some one please share your experience?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:49:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/mirroring-protection-for-critical-application/m-p/443833#M42128</guid>
      <dc:creator>FelixZhou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T09:49:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: mirroring protection for critical application</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/mirroring-protection-for-critical-application/m-p/443858#M42129</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Managing risk vs failure domains is a question of money and technology. Load balancing isn't what you're looking for. Snapmirror Business Continuity to another HA is probably the easiest option to implement at a storage level. Have a read of the TR for more information -&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.netapp.com/media/21888-tr-4878.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.netapp.com/media/21888-tr-4878.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 02:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/mirroring-protection-for-critical-application/m-p/443858#M42129</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-28T02:08:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

