<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: storage efficiency in oracle database in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449788#M43052</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If the data isn't already encrypted or compressed, then 3:1 is about the median. As Dave said, it's also a lot of "It depends". We evaluated some internal production datafiles here at NetApp, taken at random, and we found between 2:1 ands 6:1 efficiency.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've also had customers with a lot of datafiles that didn't have blocks, and that sort of data gets about 80:1 efficiency because that gets stored is the datafile block header/trailer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We also had a support case a while back where efficiency was basically 1:1. It wasn't compressed, it was just a massive index of flat files stored elsewhere. It was an extremely efficient way to store data that was also super-random. Conceptually, it was like compressed data, but it wasn't "compression" as we know it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>steiner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-18T16:41:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>storage efficiency in oracle database</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449781#M43049</link>
      <description>Hi, expert , Would you share some experience for storage efficiency in oracle database ? Customer wanna achieve 3:1 ONTAP storage efficiency. Rgds, Jackie</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449781#M43049</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jackiez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T09:42:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: storage efficiency in oracle database</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449786#M43050</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For starters, make sure they are not encrypting their databases. That’s a sure way to get ZERO efficiencies. The whole point of encryption is to eliminate patterns in data which is what efficiencies 100% count on&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:49:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449786#M43050</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMACMD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-18T15:49:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: storage efficiency in oracle database</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449787#M43051</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;There's a whole lot of "it depends" here...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are the workloads on these DB's transactional? &amp;nbsp;Analytical? &amp;nbsp;What options to the Oracle DB (assuming Enterprise Edition) is the customer utilizing? &amp;nbsp;Etc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:15:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449787#M43051</guid>
      <dc:creator>dkrenik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-18T16:15:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: storage efficiency in oracle database</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449788#M43052</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the data isn't already encrypted or compressed, then 3:1 is about the median. As Dave said, it's also a lot of "It depends". We evaluated some internal production datafiles here at NetApp, taken at random, and we found between 2:1 ands 6:1 efficiency.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've also had customers with a lot of datafiles that didn't have blocks, and that sort of data gets about 80:1 efficiency because that gets stored is the datafile block header/trailer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We also had a support case a while back where efficiency was basically 1:1. It wasn't compressed, it was just a massive index of flat files stored elsewhere. It was an extremely efficient way to store data that was also super-random. Conceptually, it was like compressed data, but it wasn't "compression" as we know it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449788#M43052</guid>
      <dc:creator>steiner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-18T16:41:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: storage efficiency in oracle database</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449809#M43057</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Steiner,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Thank you for such profound explanation !&amp;nbsp; Very useful guidance for my further moving !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jackie&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:12:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449809#M43057</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jackiez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-19T08:12:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: storage efficiency in oracle database</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449810#M43058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, TMACMD!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:15:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449810#M43058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jackiez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-19T08:15:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: storage efficiency in oracle database</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449811#M43059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp; Drenik,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Yes, the workload is transactional&amp;nbsp; Oracle EE .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:17:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/storage-efficiency-in-oracle-database/m-p/449811#M43059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jackiez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-19T08:17:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

