<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ONTAP Select - Host w/ 2x 25GbE ports in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ONTAP-Select-Host-w-2x-25GbE-ports/m-p/453983#M43770</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTAP Select docs (&lt;A href="https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap-select/concept_nw_vsphere_vswitch_config.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap-select/concept_nw_vsphere_vswitch_config.html&lt;/A&gt;) states that for a deployment of a 2-node OTS cluster in 25GbE 2-port hosts.. we should use active-active NIC teaming:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="pedro_rocha_0-1721137816331.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28705i88CBDBB041566579/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="pedro_rocha_0-1721137816331.png" alt="pedro_rocha_0-1721137816331.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But also, there's a table describing active/standby teaming:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="pedro_rocha_1-1721137850241.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28706i1619769FAEB8D517/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="pedro_rocha_1-1721137850241.png" alt="pedro_rocha_1-1721137850241.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, I guess we should use active/standby and the above picture is wrong (active-active should be replaced by active-standy). Does it make sense?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pedro&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pedro_rocha</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-16T13:52:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ONTAP Select - Host w/ 2x 25GbE ports</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ONTAP-Select-Host-w-2x-25GbE-ports/m-p/453983#M43770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTAP Select docs (&lt;A href="https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap-select/concept_nw_vsphere_vswitch_config.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap-select/concept_nw_vsphere_vswitch_config.html&lt;/A&gt;) states that for a deployment of a 2-node OTS cluster in 25GbE 2-port hosts.. we should use active-active NIC teaming:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="pedro_rocha_0-1721137816331.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28705i88CBDBB041566579/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="pedro_rocha_0-1721137816331.png" alt="pedro_rocha_0-1721137816331.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But also, there's a table describing active/standby teaming:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="pedro_rocha_1-1721137850241.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28706i1619769FAEB8D517/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="pedro_rocha_1-1721137850241.png" alt="pedro_rocha_1-1721137850241.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, I guess we should use active/standby and the above picture is wrong (active-active should be replaced by active-standy). Does it make sense?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pedro&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ONTAP-Select-Host-w-2x-25GbE-ports/m-p/453983#M43770</guid>
      <dc:creator>pedro_rocha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-16T13:52:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ONTAP Select - Host w/ 2x 25GbE ports</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ONTAP-Select-Host-w-2x-25GbE-ports/m-p/453990#M43772</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/10744"&gt;@pedro_rocha&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand that this can be confusing and I would agree that "Active-Active NIC teaming" is not the best wording, though it is still Active-Active.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Essentially both NICs on the ESXi host are active:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;vmnic0 is &lt;STRONG&gt;active&lt;/STRONG&gt; for External 1 and Internal 1, but is standby for Internal 2 and External 2&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;vmnic1 is &lt;STRONG&gt;active&lt;/STRONG&gt; for Internal 2 and External 2, but is standby for External 1 and Internal 1.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is not an active/active LAG/Bond/LACP group.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 02:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ONTAP-Select-Host-w-2x-25GbE-ports/m-p/453990#M43772</guid>
      <dc:creator>chamfer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-17T02:41:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ONTAP Select - Host w/ 2x 25GbE ports</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ONTAP-Select-Host-w-2x-25GbE-ports/m-p/454006#M43780</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem is that it is possible to set the portgroup as active-active (without using LAG/Bond/LACP).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That drawing is misleading the reader as the table is pretty straightforward that the recommendation is active-standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For a given portgroup the configuration is active-standby. From the ESXi host perspective, all the NICs are active.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:21:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ONTAP-Select-Host-w-2x-25GbE-ports/m-p/454006#M43780</guid>
      <dc:creator>pedro_rocha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-18T14:21:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

