<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: what is the best choice as second tier for AFF clusters in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460839#M44965</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;thank you for the reply . we used to think about use FAS as second tier of AFF, but the problem is FAS and AFF cannot be formed as one cluster, then easily move data around between tiers. we will have to manually move some data from AFF to FAS. they are not sharing space.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 13:44:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FelixZhou</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-20T13:44:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>what is the best choice as second tier for AFF clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460549#M44945</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;we have more than 10 small AFF clusters on different locations. the space is always an issue when time goes on. we are thinking to add a second tier for archiving old data instead of keep spending the capacities. the question is which one is the best choices financially and technically, StorageGRID, cloud or something else?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please share your experience if you are facing similar situation. thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 13:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460549#M44945</guid>
      <dc:creator>FelixZhou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-08T13:51:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: what is the best choice as second tier for AFF clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460736#M44953</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What about FAS clusters if performance is not an issue and just to archive old data. We use FAS 83xx and 87xx for vaulting and image archival.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 03:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460736#M44953</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sanaman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-15T03:54:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: what is the best choice as second tier for AFF clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460833#M44963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;FAS series will suit your requirement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can have combination of AFF &amp;amp; FAS series.&lt;BR /&gt;Storage Grid &amp;amp; cloud are costly.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 10:45:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460833#M44963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sairajeevmic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-20T10:45:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: what is the best choice as second tier for AFF clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460839#M44965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thank you for the reply . we used to think about use FAS as second tier of AFF, but the problem is FAS and AFF cannot be formed as one cluster, then easily move data around between tiers. we will have to manually move some data from AFF to FAS. they are not sharing space.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 13:44:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460839#M44965</guid>
      <dc:creator>FelixZhou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-20T13:44:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: what is the best choice as second tier for AFF clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460840#M44966</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can form cluster using AFF &amp;amp; FAS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;you can use&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;volume move&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;operation to non-disruptively migrate data.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pricing - you need to check with Account team.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 14:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460840#M44966</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sairajeevmic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-20T14:14:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: what is the best choice as second tier for AFF clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460841#M44967</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good to know. If this is the case. FAS probably a best choice for our second tier search.&lt;BR /&gt;I believe we will need to add switches by adding FAS node pairs.&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Fei Zhou&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 00:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/what-is-the-best-choice-as-second-tier-for-AFF-clusters/m-p/460841#M44967</guid>
      <dc:creator>FelixZhou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-23T00:15:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

