topic Re: Snapshot locking/SnapLock keeps an extra Snapshot in ONTAP Discussions

Snapshot locking/SnapLock keeps an extra Snapshot

reckonerx — Mon, 23 Jun 2025 19:18:05 GMT

I'm testing Snapshot locking/SnapLock and I'm seeing behavior that I didn't expect.

I have a Snapshot policy configured to take hourly Snapshots with Maximum Snapshot copies = 4 and SnapLock retention period = 4.

I always have 5 hourly Snapshot copies though instead of 4. This screen grab was taken at 2:25 PM. I don't expect the the Snapshot copy from 2:05 PM to still exist.

I'm pretty sure that this is because the SnapLock retention period doesn't expire in time for it to be deleted. It must be a matter of seconds.

On a volume with a large amount of data and/or changes between Snapshots, that extra one could end up taking lots of storage.

I just want to ask if others have experienced this and if it's expected, or if there's a workaround?

I have a support case for this and the TSE did not have an immediate answer but will look into it.

Re: Snapshot locking/SnapLock keeps an extra Snapshot

Sergey_Osipov — Tue, 24 Jun 2025 09:24:54 GMT

snapshot locking retention is by time not by amount of snapshots

https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap/snaplock/snapshot-lock-concept.html#enable-snapshot-locking-when-creating-a-volume

Re: Snapshot locking/SnapLock keeps an extra Snapshot

reckonerx — Tue, 24 Jun 2025 12:39:30 GMT

Correct. The screen grab taken at 2:25 PM still shows a Snapshot that expired at 2:05 PM though.

Probably because the SnapLock retention period doesn't expire in time for it to be deleted so I'm asking if others have experienced this and it's expected, or if there's a workaround.

Re: Snapshot locking/SnapLock keeps an extra Snapshot

Sergey_Osipov — Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:02:56 GMT

Apologies I missed your screenshot with expiry-time

I understand your point

and the same picture you are facing I was easily able to repro in a lab.

The thing here is a new 5th snapshot is created at the same time when the oldest snapshot is still locked so unable to be removed.

And snapshot locking trumps rotation.

It is an expected behavior from the system and if I change the retention period from 20 min to 1199sec they will be rotating just as expected

cluster1::*> snap list test_snaplock_volume -fields snaplock-expiry-time
vserver volume snapshot snaplock-expiry-time
------------- -------------------- ---------------------- --------------------
test_snaplock test_snaplock_volume 5min.2025-06-24_1310 6/24/2025 13:30:00 +00:00
test_snaplock test_snaplock_volume 5min.2025-06-24_1315 6/24/2025 13:35:00 +00:00
test_snaplock test_snaplock_volume 5min.2025-06-24_1320 6/24/2025 13:40:00 +00:00
test_snaplock test_snaplock_volume 5min.2025-06-24_1325 6/24/2025 13:45:00 +00:00
test_snaplock test_snaplock_volume 5min.2025-06-24_1330 6/24/2025 13:50:00 +00:00
7 entries were displayed.

cluster1::*> snapshot policy show test
Vserver: cluster1
Number of Is
Policy Name Schedules Enabled Comment
------------------------ --------- ------- ----------------------------------
test 1 true -
Schedule Count Prefix SnapMirror Label Retention Period
-------------- ----- ------------- ------------------ ------------------
5min 4 5min - 1200 seconds

cluster1::*> snapshot policy modify-schedule -policy test -schedule 5min -newretention-period 1199 seconds

after waiting for a while to let previous snaps with retention of 20min to rotate

cluster1::*> snap list test_snaplock_volume -fields snaplock-expiry-time
vserver volume snapshot snaplock-expiry-time
------------- -------------------- ---------------------- --------------------
test_snaplock test_snaplock_volume 5min.2025-06-24_1345 6/24/2025 14:04:59 +00:00
test_snaplock test_snaplock_volume 5min.2025-06-24_1350 6/24/2025 14:09:59 +00:00
test_snaplock test_snaplock_volume 5min.2025-06-24_1355 6/24/2025 14:14:59 +00:00
test_snaplock test_snaplock_volume 5min.2025-06-24_1400 6/24/2025 14:19:59 +00:00

Re: Snapshot locking/SnapLock keeps an extra Snapshot

reckonerx — Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:12:22 GMT

Thank you for going through the process of recreating the issue.

I had the same idea to set expiration to 239 minutes instead of 4 hours (240 minutes) but you can only enter a number between from 1-60 minutes.

Re: Snapshot locking/SnapLock keeps an extra Snapshot

Sergey_Osipov — Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:21:31 GMT

noone stops you from using seconds 😉

the duration for retention period must be in seconds (0 - 65535), minutes (0 - 60), hours (0 - 24), days (0 - 36500), months (0 - 1200), years (0 - 100).

So in your case 4 hours = 14400 seconds

You are free to use 14399 as an example

Re: Snapshot locking/SnapLock keeps an extra Snapshot

reckonerx — Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:26:36 GMT

Interesting! In the GUI the smallest available increment is minutes.

But the CLI will allow me to use seconds?

Re: Snapshot locking/SnapLock keeps an extra Snapshot

Sergey_Osipov — Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:30:21 GMT

for sure seconds can be used in CLI

command example is in my previous comment