<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Restore old Netapp FAS2254 in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Restore-old-Netapp-FAS2254/m-p/463839#M45201</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I took back a old Netapp from one of your client, a FAS2554. I need to recover this old boy, to use it at a lab.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The thing is, it is unhealthy . It is a 2 controller chassis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I began by update the both nodes from Ontap version 8.3.2 to 9.1P20. (to have a UI that I can access. TLS 1.0)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have now another problem in my cluster. My node 1 doesn't come online in the cluster .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554::&amp;gt; storage failover show&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Takeover&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Node Partner Possible State Description&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;-------------- -------------- -------- -------------------------------------&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-01 BNAP2554-02 true Connected to BNAP2554-02. Waiting&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;for cluster applications to come&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;online on the local node. Offline&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;applications: mgmt, vldb, vifmgr,&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;bcomd, crs.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-02 BNAP2554-01 true Connected to BNAP2554-01, Partial&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;giveback&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;2 entries were displayed.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I think I know why. Cause of thoses interclusters ports that doesn't show up Up/up but up/-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554::&amp;gt; network interface show -role cluster&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Logical Status Network Current Current Is&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Vserver Interface Admin/Oper Address/Mask Node Port Home&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;----------- ---------- ---------- ------------------ ------------- ------- ----&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Cluster&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-01_clus1&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;up/-&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://169.254.37.50/16" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer ugc"&gt;169.254.37.50/16&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;BNAP2554-01 e0e true&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-01_clus2&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;up/-&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://169.254.106.147/16" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer ugc"&gt;169.254.106.147/16&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;BNAP2554-01 e0f true&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-02_clus1&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;up/up&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://169.254.244.248/16" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer ugc"&gt;169.254.244.248/16&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;BNAP2554-02 e0e true&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-02_clus2&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;up/up&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://169.254.65.42/16" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer ugc"&gt;169.254.65.42/16&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;BNAP2554-02 e0f true&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;4 entries were displayed.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you guys think about it ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just for your information :&lt;BR /&gt;Ports 0b and 0a from node one are conencted to to node 2 port 0a and 0b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ports e0e and e0f from node one are connected to node 2 port e0e and e0f&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 06:14:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Julien_Mos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-24T06:14:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Restore old Netapp FAS2254</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Restore-old-Netapp-FAS2254/m-p/463839#M45201</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I took back a old Netapp from one of your client, a FAS2554. I need to recover this old boy, to use it at a lab.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The thing is, it is unhealthy . It is a 2 controller chassis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I began by update the both nodes from Ontap version 8.3.2 to 9.1P20. (to have a UI that I can access. TLS 1.0)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have now another problem in my cluster. My node 1 doesn't come online in the cluster .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554::&amp;gt; storage failover show&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Takeover&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Node Partner Possible State Description&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;-------------- -------------- -------- -------------------------------------&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-01 BNAP2554-02 true Connected to BNAP2554-02. Waiting&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;for cluster applications to come&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;online on the local node. Offline&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;applications: mgmt, vldb, vifmgr,&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;bcomd, crs.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-02 BNAP2554-01 true Connected to BNAP2554-01, Partial&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;giveback&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;2 entries were displayed.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I think I know why. Cause of thoses interclusters ports that doesn't show up Up/up but up/-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554::&amp;gt; network interface show -role cluster&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Logical Status Network Current Current Is&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Vserver Interface Admin/Oper Address/Mask Node Port Home&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;----------- ---------- ---------- ------------------ ------------- ------- ----&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Cluster&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-01_clus1&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;up/-&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://169.254.37.50/16" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer ugc"&gt;169.254.37.50/16&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;BNAP2554-01 e0e true&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-01_clus2&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;up/-&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://169.254.106.147/16" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer ugc"&gt;169.254.106.147/16&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;BNAP2554-01 e0f true&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-02_clus1&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;up/up&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://169.254.244.248/16" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer ugc"&gt;169.254.244.248/16&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;BNAP2554-02 e0e true&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;BNAP2554-02_clus2&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;up/up&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://169.254.65.42/16" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer ugc"&gt;169.254.65.42/16&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;BNAP2554-02 e0f true&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;4 entries were displayed.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you guys think about it ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just for your information :&lt;BR /&gt;Ports 0b and 0a from node one are conencted to to node 2 port 0a and 0b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ports e0e and e0f from node one are connected to node 2 port e0e and e0f&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 06:14:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Restore-old-Netapp-FAS2254/m-p/463839#M45201</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julien_Mos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-24T06:14:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

