<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NetApp FAS2520 new spare HDD was detected as SAS with RPM 15000 while others are FSAS with RPM72 in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-FAS2520-new-spare-HDD-was-detected-as-SAS-with-RPM-15000-while-others-are/m-p/467244#M45383</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;add pictures of old (labeled old 0a.00.8) and new HDD&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 11:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zeam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-05-18T11:39:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NetApp FAS2520 new spare HDD was detected as SAS with RPM 15000 while others are FSAS with RPM7200</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-FAS2520-new-spare-HDD-was-detected-as-SAS-with-RPM-15000-while-others-are/m-p/467243#M45382</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Recently I met that FAS2520 HDD failed issue (0a.00.1 and 0a.00.8 failed, 0a.00.3 in maintenance testing) and no available spare HDD. I order 3 new HDDs with same PN, and set spares to new 0a.00.1 and 0a.00.8 successfully. But system did not auto rebuilding. And detect 0a.00.1 and 0a.00.8 as&amp;nbsp;SAS with RPM 15000 while others are&amp;nbsp;FSAS with RPM7200. What is the best next plan? Thanks in advance for your advice.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 11:36:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-FAS2520-new-spare-HDD-was-detected-as-SAS-with-RPM-15000-while-others-are/m-p/467243#M45382</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zeam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-18T11:36:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp FAS2520 new spare HDD was detected as SAS with RPM 15000 while others are FSAS with RPM72</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-FAS2520-new-spare-HDD-was-detected-as-SAS-with-RPM-15000-while-others-are/m-p/467244#M45383</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;add pictures of old (labeled old 0a.00.8) and new HDD&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 11:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-FAS2520-new-spare-HDD-was-detected-as-SAS-with-RPM-15000-while-others-are/m-p/467244#M45383</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zeam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-18T11:39:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp FAS2520 new spare HDD was detected as SAS with RPM 15000 while others are FSAS with RPM72</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-FAS2520-new-spare-HDD-was-detected-as-SAS-with-RPM-15000-while-others-are/m-p/467251#M45384</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Where did you get the disks from? Maybe the gray market biting you in the rump?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;How about just pasting output instead of pictures&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Disk show -fields model, firmware&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:53:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/NetApp-FAS2520-new-spare-HDD-was-detected-as-SAS-with-RPM-15000-while-others-are/m-p/467251#M45384</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMACMD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-18T14:53:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

