<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Looking for systems that unintentionally shipped with DOT 8.1 installed in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20055#M4730</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick response Michael, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You seem to be a bottomless pit of helpful information! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try your suggestions and e-mail you if neccesary. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Chris &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CCOLEMAN_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-01T16:49:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Looking for systems that unintentionally shipped with DOT 8.1 installed</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20033#M4717</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm receiving reports from Channel Partners of FAS3200 and 20x0 systems being delivered to customer with 8.1RC2 installed.&amp;nbsp; All of them claim 8.1 was not specified in the sales order.&amp;nbsp; Product Ops has been notified and is looking into this.&amp;nbsp; Please post if you've seen systems delivered in the last two weeks (Feb 12 - present)&amp;nbsp; with 8.1 installed so we can figure out where 8.1 is being specified in the ordering or shipping process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FYI, there appears to be a bug in 8.1RC2 where if you try to revert to an earlier version, the ONTAP upgrader sees it as a downgrade and does not prompt the user to run revert_to&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; There's a BURT open on this.&amp;nbsp; If you've had this problem, please open a case with NGS and ask them to attach the case to BURT 540949&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:33:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20033#M4717</guid>
      <dc:creator>mcope</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:33:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for systems that unintentionally shipped with DOT 8.1 installed</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20038#M4719</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this bug present in 8.1RC3 as well?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:05:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20038#M4719</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-29T19:05:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for systems that unintentionally shipped with DOT 8.1 installed</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20042#M4721</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since RC3 came out before the BURT was created, I would assume it is (but with 2 months between the release dates or RC2 and RC3, maybe we will get lucky).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:11:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20042#M4721</guid>
      <dc:creator>mcope</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-29T19:11:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for systems that unintentionally shipped with DOT 8.1 installed</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20045#M4724</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey Michael, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are doing a tech refresh for a customer that's scheduled for Monday. It's on 3210HA and one 3210, and we did not specify 8.1. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm kind of curious which versions the filers got shipped with, and I was wondering if we would be able to find this out before Monday, without the customer opening up the boxes and trying to find out themselves. (they're 3 hours away so driving down there is kind of rough) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there someone maybe we can call or check with to see what it got shipped out with? This way we can prepare a little further for Monday? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked the final quote / oew and it only says "SW-3210-ONTAP8-C"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the heads up and I will report back with our results either way. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:07:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20045#M4724</guid>
      <dc:creator>CCOLEMAN_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T16:07:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for systems that unintentionally shipped with DOT 8.1 installed</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20050#M4727</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;ADDRESS&gt;The easiest way to find out what version of ONTAP is shipped is to get the NetApp Sales Order number and log into the NOW website.&amp;nbsp; There's a link on the homepage to check Order Status (&lt;A href="http://now.netapp.com/eservice/orderstatus/osp.jsp" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/eservice/orderstatus/osp.jsp&lt;/A&gt;.)&lt;/ADDRESS&gt;&lt;ADDRESS&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/ADDRESS&gt;&lt;ADDRESS&gt; The tool also can search on Purchase Order (although I've never tried it) or by open orders by customer name.&amp;nbsp; If the system was shipped with 8.1 the Sales Order will have an entry like this:&lt;/ADDRESS&gt;&lt;ADDRESS&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/ADDRESS&gt;&lt;ADDRESS&gt;&lt;TABLE border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="140"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD nowrap="nowrap" style="background: #FFC000; padding: .75pt .75pt 0 .75pt;" valign="bottom" width="140"&gt;&lt;P style="margin-bottom: 12.0pt;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: black;"&gt;SW-ONTAP8.1-7M &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/ADDRESS&gt;&lt;ADDRESS&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/ADDRESS&gt;&lt;ADDRESS&gt;If you have trouble getting this info, send me an email with the customer name through pshelp@netapp.com&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/ADDRESS&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:37:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20050#M4727</guid>
      <dc:creator>mcope</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T16:37:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for systems that unintentionally shipped with DOT 8.1 installed</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20055#M4730</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick response Michael, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You seem to be a bottomless pit of helpful information! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try your suggestions and e-mail you if neccesary. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Chris &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20055#M4730</guid>
      <dc:creator>CCOLEMAN_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-01T16:49:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for systems that unintentionally shipped with DOT 8.1 installed</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20060#M4733</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the latest:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; A few weeks ago, SnapLock was added to a license bundle.&amp;nbsp; If you select the right combination of license bundles a la carte instead of the 'complete' bundle, the order tool automagically selects 8.1 because that's the only current version of ONTAP that supports SnapLock.&amp;nbsp; We're working to change how SnapLock gets selected, but for now make sure your sales reps don't generate orders with the SnapLock license.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-systems-that-unintentionally-shipped-with-DOT-8-1-installed/m-p/20060#M4733</guid>
      <dc:creator>mcope</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-02T01:06:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

