<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: aggregate need? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20746#M4892</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;because it scales better? its more flexible to manage than a set of X disks. There are many reasons. Maybe we can approach this the other way around: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what is bad about using aggregates? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:08:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>eric_barlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-17T07:08:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>aggregate need?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20717#M4887</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Why we need an aggregate seprately?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; why cant we use a raid group directly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Saran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20717#M4887</guid>
      <dc:creator>saranraj456</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:58:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate need?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20722#M4888</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Put simply because there can be more that one RAID group in an aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depends on size and type of disk, but with a large of small disks there could be several RAID groups (a RAID is the data and parity disks)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20722#M4888</guid>
      <dc:creator>nigelg1965</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-14T15:14:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate need?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20730#M4889</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not know why you would want to, but maybe traditional volumes are something to look into? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:49:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20730#M4889</guid>
      <dc:creator>joostvandrenth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-15T08:49:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate need?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20735#M4890</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;no, i am generally asking the need and use of aggregate.....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:03:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20735#M4890</guid>
      <dc:creator>saranraj456</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-16T12:03:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate need?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20738#M4891</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having evolved from a traditional volume (which can be seen as 1-1 relation between a RaidGroup and a volume) I see an aggregate as the physical to virtual transformation of storage capacity - it is the construct from which you can provision volumes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20738#M4891</guid>
      <dc:creator>joostvandrenth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-16T14:55:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate need?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20746#M4892</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;because it scales better? its more flexible to manage than a set of X disks. There are many reasons. Maybe we can approach this the other way around: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what is bad about using aggregates? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:08:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20746#M4892</guid>
      <dc:creator>eric_barlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-17T07:08:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate need?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20749#M4893</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason is aggregate holds the raid group, aggregate is nothing but a raid group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ashritha.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:52:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20749#M4893</guid>
      <dc:creator>ashritha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-19T11:52:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate need?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20756#M4895</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you start using by raid groups, then you have to create a number of raidgroups as per your space requirement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the same way, if you start using aggregate, there is no matter of how many raidgroups it is... still u can handle all the raidgroups in the same aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:56:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20756#M4895</guid>
      <dc:creator>satish_pamarthi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-02T19:56:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate need?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20760#M4898</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Saran,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To use the diskshelf you must bind the disk in aggrigate. you can' create raidgroup witout creating the aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bhola Gond&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:34:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20760#M4898</guid>
      <dc:creator>bondbhola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-04T11:34:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate need?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20765#M4901</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below link will help you to understand the relaionship for disk-aggregate-volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.netapp.com/people/BrendonHiggins/blog/2013/02/03/disks-aggregates-volumes-qtrees-and-luns" title="https://communities.netapp.com/people/BrendonHiggins/blog/2013/02/03/disks-aggregates-volumes-qtrees-and-luns" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.netapp.com/people/BrendonHiggins/blog/2013/02/03/disks-aggregates-volumes-qtrees-and-luns&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:36:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20765#M4901</guid>
      <dc:creator>bondbhola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-04T11:36:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>aggregate need?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20770#M4904</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Frndz, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i got an answer already ,its one of my old post.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 03:58:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-need/m-p/20770#M4904</guid>
      <dc:creator>saranraj456</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-05T03:58:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

