<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Atto FibreBridge 6500N Management Ports in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Atto-FibreBridge-6500N-Management-Ports/m-p/22591#M5327</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you take a look for metrocluster configuration guide you can see, that only one management port per ATTO is used in there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't see why you couldn't configure both ports with seperate ip addresses, but if I remeber correctly, there is no trunking possibility.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is also second SAS port you can't use with NetApp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the main reason is because it's product from Atto, and it's not only for NetApp environments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's also cheaper to manufacture one model with two ports than two seperate models.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So far, I haven't configure any ATTOs with two management ports, maybe I use the second port, when the first breaks &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Br.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ismo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ismopuuronen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-09T15:29:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Atto FibreBridge 6500N Management Ports</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Atto-FibreBridge-6500N-Management-Ports/m-p/22587#M5325</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I better use the second management port on Atto FibreBridges? I don't understand how they can add value to the solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it adding another management IP address plugged in another management switch? It does not seem very nice...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to trunk both management ports for failover?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pedro Rocha.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:10:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Atto-FibreBridge-6500N-Management-Ports/m-p/22587#M5325</guid>
      <dc:creator>pedro_rocha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:10:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atto FibreBridge 6500N Management Ports</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Atto-FibreBridge-6500N-Management-Ports/m-p/22591#M5327</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you take a look for metrocluster configuration guide you can see, that only one management port per ATTO is used in there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't see why you couldn't configure both ports with seperate ip addresses, but if I remeber correctly, there is no trunking possibility.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is also second SAS port you can't use with NetApp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the main reason is because it's product from Atto, and it's not only for NetApp environments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's also cheaper to manufacture one model with two ports than two seperate models.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So far, I haven't configure any ATTOs with two management ports, maybe I use the second port, when the first breaks &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Br.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ismo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Atto-FibreBridge-6500N-Management-Ports/m-p/22591#M5327</guid>
      <dc:creator>ismopuuronen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-09T15:29:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Atto FibreBridge 6500N Management Ports</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Atto-FibreBridge-6500N-Management-Ports/m-p/22596#M5329</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey Ismo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I saw we only use the first port. But I also saw on another NetApp document that you might want to configure the second one, although the document does not justify why we would want to do it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the end, it is just curiosity...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pedro Rocha.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:33:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Atto-FibreBridge-6500N-Management-Ports/m-p/22596#M5329</guid>
      <dc:creator>pedro_rocha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-14T14:33:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

