<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic &amp;quot;FC/VI cluster adapter&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;FCVI Host Adapter&amp;quot; in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/quot-FC-VI-cluster-adapter-quot-and-quot-FCVI-Host-Adapter-quot/m-p/25795#M6065</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello All!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The technical report "Best Practices for MetroCluster Design and Implementation" mentions "an FC/VI cluster adapter". The output of my &lt;STRONG&gt;sysconfig&lt;/STRONG&gt; command mentions some "FCVI Host Adapter". Do these "FC/VI cluster adapter" and "FCVI Host Adapter" mean the same?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you if you answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:59:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>alexander7</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:59:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"FC/VI cluster adapter" and "FCVI Host Adapter"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/quot-FC-VI-cluster-adapter-quot-and-quot-FCVI-Host-Adapter-quot/m-p/25795#M6065</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello All!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The technical report "Best Practices for MetroCluster Design and Implementation" mentions "an FC/VI cluster adapter". The output of my &lt;STRONG&gt;sysconfig&lt;/STRONG&gt; command mentions some "FCVI Host Adapter". Do these "FC/VI cluster adapter" and "FCVI Host Adapter" mean the same?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you if you answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:59:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/quot-FC-VI-cluster-adapter-quot-and-quot-FCVI-Host-Adapter-quot/m-p/25795#M6065</guid>
      <dc:creator>alexander7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:59:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "FC/VI cluster adapter" and "FCVI Host Adapter"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/quot-FC-VI-cluster-adapter-quot-and-quot-FCVI-Host-Adapter-quot/m-p/25800#M6068</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is old but I see there is no answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The FCVI card replaces the system interconnect card.&amp;nbsp; The traditional card is an IB card with Mellanox connectors and uses the traditional VIA.&amp;nbsp; The FCVI card replaces the existing Interconnect card for communication between cluster heads for failover, replication, HA, memory mirroring, etc...&amp;nbsp; FCVI uses VIA as the ULP of FC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any time you see FCVI and Metrocluster, it should be referencing this same card.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH... a day late &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:14:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/quot-FC-VI-cluster-adapter-quot-and-quot-FCVI-Host-Adapter-quot/m-p/25800#M6068</guid>
      <dc:creator>vince_labua</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-31T15:14:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

