<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SMSQL Multiple instances on same LUNs / FlexVols in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SMSQL-Multiple-instances-on-same-LUNs-FlexVols/m-p/29475#M6868</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi NetApp Communities,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question I should be able to answer myself from numerous SMSQL installations, but unfortunately I've never tried this particular setup. IHAC who has 20 SQL 2K8 instances installed on a standalone W2K8 Enterprise x64 server. I am planning the migration to SnapManager for SQL and associated storage layout and sizing. At the moment all the instance DBs and logs are installed on the C: drive. If it were just a few instances I would plan for the following for each instance: DB LUN / FlexVol, Logs LUN / FlexVol, SnapInfo LUN / FlexVol , System DB LUN / FlexVol. However with 20 instances this leads to 80 LUNs / FlexVols.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am wondering if it is possible to rationalize this setup and put multiple instances on the same set of LUNs / FlexVols. So for example, have 5 sets of LUNs / FlexVols, with 4 instances sharing each LUN / FlexVol set - is this possible to do and supported?&amp;nbsp; And here is the key question,&amp;nbsp; if so, would it be possible to have a single backup job spanning the instances sharing the same LUNs / FlexVols, and just creating a single SnapShot on each FlexVol for the backup job? I know it's possible to federate backups, but my main concern is if this operates serially and backups are still per instance, then I would end up with multiple SnapShots on each FlexVol which are not consistent for all instances, a big mess in other words. Has anyone tried this setup?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greg Davis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VMtech PSC, Australia&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GREGDAVIS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:54:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SMSQL Multiple instances on same LUNs / FlexVols</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SMSQL-Multiple-instances-on-same-LUNs-FlexVols/m-p/29475#M6868</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi NetApp Communities,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question I should be able to answer myself from numerous SMSQL installations, but unfortunately I've never tried this particular setup. IHAC who has 20 SQL 2K8 instances installed on a standalone W2K8 Enterprise x64 server. I am planning the migration to SnapManager for SQL and associated storage layout and sizing. At the moment all the instance DBs and logs are installed on the C: drive. If it were just a few instances I would plan for the following for each instance: DB LUN / FlexVol, Logs LUN / FlexVol, SnapInfo LUN / FlexVol , System DB LUN / FlexVol. However with 20 instances this leads to 80 LUNs / FlexVols.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am wondering if it is possible to rationalize this setup and put multiple instances on the same set of LUNs / FlexVols. So for example, have 5 sets of LUNs / FlexVols, with 4 instances sharing each LUN / FlexVol set - is this possible to do and supported?&amp;nbsp; And here is the key question,&amp;nbsp; if so, would it be possible to have a single backup job spanning the instances sharing the same LUNs / FlexVols, and just creating a single SnapShot on each FlexVol for the backup job? I know it's possible to federate backups, but my main concern is if this operates serially and backups are still per instance, then I would end up with multiple SnapShots on each FlexVol which are not consistent for all instances, a big mess in other words. Has anyone tried this setup?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greg Davis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VMtech PSC, Australia&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SMSQL-Multiple-instances-on-same-LUNs-FlexVols/m-p/29475#M6868</guid>
      <dc:creator>GREGDAVIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:54:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL Multiple instances on same LUNs / FlexVols</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SMSQL-Multiple-instances-on-same-LUNs-FlexVols/m-p/29480#M6871</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Greg,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;did you ever get an answer to this post?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am currently in the same situation and would like to know in advance if it is possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings from Switzerland,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stephan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:52:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SMSQL-Multiple-instances-on-same-LUNs-FlexVols/m-p/29480#M6871</guid>
      <dc:creator>DARTHVADERNW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-06T10:52:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

