<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Estimated saving on E-Mail archive in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Estimated-saving-on-E-Mail-archive/m-p/29954#M7003</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Together!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We use a gateway solution to archive our E-Mails, which are stored (legal audit proof) in an sybase database. So smtp data is stored inside the database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On our FAS2050 we have an 1,5 TB CIFS Volume for the database, which uses ~350GB currently.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you think, does it make sense to dedupe the volume? And if, what would be the space saving?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps some of you already own similar experiences?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope you understand what I want to ask you in my, not perfect ;-), english.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your answers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:26:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marcelruholl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:26:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Estimated saving on E-Mail archive</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Estimated-saving-on-E-Mail-archive/m-p/29954#M7003</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Together!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We use a gateway solution to archive our E-Mails, which are stored (legal audit proof) in an sybase database. So smtp data is stored inside the database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On our FAS2050 we have an 1,5 TB CIFS Volume for the database, which uses ~350GB currently.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you think, does it make sense to dedupe the volume? And if, what would be the space saving?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps some of you already own similar experiences?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope you understand what I want to ask you in my, not perfect ;-), english.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your answers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:26:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Estimated-saving-on-E-Mail-archive/m-p/29954#M7003</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcelruholl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:26:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Estimated saving on E-Mail archive</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Estimated-saving-on-E-Mail-archive/m-p/29959#M7004</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It doesn't sound like you will get massive savings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, why not just go &amp;amp; try it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the end of the day it's an archive, so if some performance overhead appears, that shouldn't be a problem. If you are totally unhappy with the result you can always disable a-sis (there is a way of even un-de-duping the volume, should you see the need for it).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:51:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Estimated-saving-on-E-Mail-archive/m-p/29959#M7004</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-25T13:51:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

