<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Provisioning Manager and Thin Provisioned LUN's in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32489#M7618</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will forward your question to the Storage Management Software team.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:56:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>watan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-29T14:56:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Provisioning Manager and Thin Provisioned LUN's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32484#M7617</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to create a provisioning policy that will allow me to have thin provisioned LUN's?&amp;nbsp; What I want the policy to do is reserve the volume space, set snapshots to auto-delete, volume to auto-grow, allow the LUN to grow the volume, and have the LUN space not be reserved.&amp;nbsp; I only see 4 options, and none of them seem to accomplish all of what I need.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:19:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32484#M7617</guid>
      <dc:creator>erick_moore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:19:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provisioning Manager and Thin Provisioned LUN's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32489#M7618</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will forward your question to the Storage Management Software team.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:56:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32489#M7618</guid>
      <dc:creator>watan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-29T14:56:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provisioning Manager and Thin Provisioned LUN's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32497#M7619</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&amp;nbsp; It seems like the options are greatly scaled down in Provisioning Manager.&amp;nbsp; I understand that the UI is meant to take some of the complexity out of the setup, but I would love to see an "Advanced" mode or something similar for more seasoned users.&amp;nbsp; Exposing all of the volume options would be a nice start.&amp;nbsp; Our typical setup for ESX LUN's is Volume auto-grow, snap auto-delete, lun not space reserved and set to auto-grow volume, dedup set to run weekly, and a weekly physical reallocation scan.&amp;nbsp; Some of these things I can set, but others I obviously cannot.&amp;nbsp; I look forward to seeing the next release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:05:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32497#M7619</guid>
      <dc:creator>erick_moore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-29T15:05:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provisioning Manager and Thin Provisioned LUN's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32502#M7620</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, so maybe someone can answer the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 12pt; "&gt;Scenario 1&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Space guarantee set on volume&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fractional reserve set to 0%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Snapshots set to auto-delete&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Single LUN exists in volume and set with no space guarantee, but volume auto-grow&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 12pt; "&gt;Scenario 2&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No space guarantee set on volume&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fractional reserve set to 100%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Snapshots set to auto-delete&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Single LUN exists in volume and set with no space guarantee&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do both of these configurations accomplish the same thing?&amp;nbsp; That is a thin provisioned LUN that has no chance to go offline as there is enough protected space for the size of the LUN?&amp;nbsp; I know we have been using scenario 1 in our environment, and as long as the volume is set to auto-grow to a size slightly large than the LUN you are protected.&amp;nbsp; Will scenario 2 (as is setup by Provisioning Manager) behave the same way?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Erick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:15:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32502#M7620</guid>
      <dc:creator>erick_moore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-29T19:15:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provisioning Manager and Thin Provisioned LUN's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32507#M7621</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both scenarios look to accomplish the same thing , except scenario 1 is reserving the volume space in the aggregate as opposed to scenario 2 is not reserving any space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Scenario 2, you have the potential of running out of space in the volume if the aggr gets full.&amp;nbsp; It's probably set this way in Provisioning manager because of the toolset it has to manage its storage space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32507#M7621</guid>
      <dc:creator>watan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T16:05:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provisioning Manager and Thin Provisioned LUN's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32512#M7622</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tthat is unfortunate.&amp;nbsp; I would like to see more options exposed to PM from a Volume and LUN configuration standpoint.&amp;nbsp; As it stands right now I will still have to use my scripts to manage large groups of volumes and LUN's since PM is crippled in its ability to make the changes we need.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:29:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32512#M7622</guid>
      <dc:creator>erick_moore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T16:29:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provisioning Manager and Thin Provisioned LUN's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32517#M7623</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just want to confirm there is currently no way in Provisioning Manager to set a LUN with no space reservation but have the parent volume have a space guarantee.&amp;nbsp; Is this correct? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:06:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Provisioning-Manager-and-Thin-Provisioned-LUN-s/m-p/32517#M7623</guid>
      <dc:creator>erick_moore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-16T17:06:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

