<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Increasing Aggregate with large disk sizes in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Increasing-Aggregate-with-large-disk-sizes/m-p/35238#M8356</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As is two disk swill be added to RG with 14 disks. First set rg size to 14 and then add disks – they will go to new RG. Setting RG size does not affect existing raid groups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-28T11:45:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Increasing Aggregate with large disk sizes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Increasing-Aggregate-with-large-disk-sizes/m-p/35235#M8355</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an aggregate which is nearly full, it has 2 raid groups currently, one with 16 disks, and the other with 14 disks, the RAID group size is set to 16 disks for this aggregate.&amp;nbsp; I want to increase the disk space on this aggregate and have some spare disks which i can add to the aggregate, but the spare disks are of a larger size than the current ones used.&amp;nbsp; So if i add 5 disks to this aggregate with a larger size would they create a new 3rd raid group inthis aggregate, or would it fill up the second raid group to 16, and then rest in a 3rd raid group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:42:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Increasing-Aggregate-with-large-disk-sizes/m-p/35235#M8355</guid>
      <dc:creator>GUVNIJJAR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:42:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Increasing Aggregate with large disk sizes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Increasing-Aggregate-with-large-disk-sizes/m-p/35238#M8356</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As is two disk swill be added to RG with 14 disks. First set rg size to 14 and then add disks – they will go to new RG. Setting RG size does not affect existing raid groups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Increasing-Aggregate-with-large-disk-sizes/m-p/35238#M8356</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-28T11:45:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Increasing Aggregate with large disk sizes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Increasing-Aggregate-with-large-disk-sizes/m-p/35242#M8359</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideally don't mix drive sizes but if you have to the new raid group is a good idea... For optimal performance the best practice is to keep all raid groups the same size or within 1 drive and the same drive type (but in reality this doesn't always work out).&amp;nbsp; It is supported to do what you listed...change raid size like mentioned before the aggr add then change back to 16 after, or alternatively on aggr add you can specify "-g new" to force a new raid group on the additional 5 disks to get 3D+2P added to the aggr whithout modifying the rg size with the same effect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:55:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Increasing-Aggregate-with-large-disk-sizes/m-p/35242#M8359</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-28T11:55:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

