<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic What is the effective size of a 2TB  Netapp disk ? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38668#M9181</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We just added 2TB disks to our FAS6280 filers and they show up as 1.62TB. Is that right ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:28:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sourcecorp_lee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:28:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What is the effective size of a 2TB  Netapp disk ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38668#M9181</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We just added 2TB disks to our FAS6280 filers and they show up as 1.62TB. Is that right ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:28:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38668#M9181</guid>
      <dc:creator>sourcecorp_lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:28:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the effective size of a 2TB  Netapp disk ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38674#M9182</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. Write sizing. Block checksum and wafl &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 14:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38674#M9182</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T14:57:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the effective size of a 2TB  Netapp disk ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38679#M9184</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As Scott has mentioned, yes that is correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For reference there is a handy table within the Storage Management Guide:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="active_link" href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1114070/html/GUID-5D3F3F2D-A153-49D3-9858-04C30B3C7E74.html" title="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1114070/html/GUID-5D3F3F2D-A153-49D3-9858-04C30B3C7E74.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1114070/html/GUID-5D3F3F2D-A153-49D3-9858-04C30B3C7E74.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This gives a 2TB disk as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" frame="border" id="GUID-5D3F3F2D-A153-49D3-9858-04C30B3C7E74__TABLE_9EA87EA20A2D49F59140391EBBFD62B5" rules="all"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class="cellrowborder" headers="d30022e81 " valign="top" width="NaN%"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Disk size as described by manufacturer&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD align="right" class="cellrowborder" headers="d30022e84 " valign="top" width="NaN%"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Physical capacity (approximate)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD align="right" class="cellrowborder" headers="d30022e87 " valign="top" width="NaN%"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Usable capacity&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class="cellrowborder" headers="d30022e81 " valign="top" width="NaN%"&gt;2 TB SATA&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD align="right" class="cellrowborder" headers="d30022e84 " valign="top" width="NaN%"&gt;1,695,702 MiB&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD align="right" class="cellrowborder" headers="d30022e87 " valign="top" width="NaN%"&gt;1,695,466 MiB &lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the full how and why, KB 3011274 covers it:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=3011274" title="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=3011274" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=3011274&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 15:08:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38679#M9184</guid>
      <dc:creator>ashleycook</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T15:08:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the effective size of a 2TB  Netapp disk ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38687#M9186</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok. Just wanted to make sure this was correct before I started using them. That would explain why they sent us 96 drives to satisfy a 100TB usable order.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 15:17:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38687#M9186</guid>
      <dc:creator>sourcecorp_lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T15:17:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the effective size of a 2TB  Netapp disk ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38692#M9187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should get about 110TB usable without snapshots… an example layout with 18 drive raid groups (leaving 6 spares..more than you need but not enough for another complete raid group) assuming all on the same controller but you could split between controllers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DS4243 Shelves&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Disks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;96&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Data Disks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TB Usable no snaps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;110.0447&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Spare&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Parity&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;spare&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rg0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 16&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rg1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 16&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rg2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 16&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rg3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 16&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rg4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 16&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 15:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38692#M9187</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T15:27:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the effective size of a 2TB  Netapp disk ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38697#M9188</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the info. We split them between 2 controllers in an active/active cluster, so there were 48 disks per controller. Some were used to expand an existing aggr and the rest were grouped into a new aggr.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 15:47:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/What-is-the-effective-size-of-a-2TB-Netapp-disk/m-p/38697#M9188</guid>
      <dc:creator>sourcecorp_lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T15:47:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

