<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Overstepping the aggregat limit in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Overstepping-the-aggregat-limit/m-p/42252#M9930</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your input Michael,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was hoping to avoid creating 2 aggregates but it can't be done. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for that 1 spare, I dunno... Regardless of NetApp's optimistic predictions, I've learned that it does take a long to time to rebuild a fully loaded 1 TB SATA disk. And since double failure is not a myth, and usually has to resolved while handling normal daily workload, I personally wouldn't feel comfortable waiting for ?? hours for it to finish - hoping that something else might not go wrong during that time with the same RAID group. That's a LOT of data to be lost. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.8/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pozdrav,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 08:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>igor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-11T08:21:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Overstepping the aggregat limit</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Overstepping-the-aggregat-limit/m-p/42237#M9927</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hiya!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just a short question regarding RAID group aggregation. I've a 2020A running on DOT 7.3.4 and I'd like to attach two 14x1TB shelves (11 data, 2 parity, 1 spare) to one of it's controllers... As I remember there's a 16TB aggregate limit here, and each shelf has 8591973352 kbytes net capacity (just over 8TB) making both shelves have more just a drop over the limit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I go ahead with this, will the system allow it? If it does, can I run into some problems later on perhaps?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Overstepping-the-aggregat-limit/m-p/42237#M9927</guid>
      <dc:creator>igor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:58:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overstepping the aggregat limit</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Overstepping-the-aggregat-limit/m-p/42242#M9928</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can create aggregate with 19 1TB data disks which means 23 disks in total (2 RAID_DP RGs). I would not try to oversubscribe it, really … but it is interesting to know what happens ☺&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Overstepping-the-aggregat-limit/m-p/42242#M9928</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-18T07:27:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overstepping the aggregat limit</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Overstepping-the-aggregat-limit/m-p/42247#M9929</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simple: you can't overstep it. It's a hard limit that has to do with 32 bit block access. 0xffffffff * 4096 bytes/block = 16TB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you try to add more disks, the system will give you an error message.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your case I would create 2 aggregates with ~8.5tb each, however, I would stick with one spare disk. You don't really need one spare per shelf&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 08:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Overstepping-the-aggregat-limit/m-p/42247#M9929</guid>
      <dc:creator>Darkstar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-11T08:04:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Overstepping the aggregat limit</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Overstepping-the-aggregat-limit/m-p/42252#M9930</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your input Michael,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was hoping to avoid creating 2 aggregates but it can't be done. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for that 1 spare, I dunno... Regardless of NetApp's optimistic predictions, I've learned that it does take a long to time to rebuild a fully loaded 1 TB SATA disk. And since double failure is not a myth, and usually has to resolved while handling normal daily workload, I personally wouldn't feel comfortable waiting for ?? hours for it to finish - hoping that something else might not go wrong during that time with the same RAID group. That's a LOT of data to be lost. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.8/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pozdrav,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 08:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Overstepping-the-aggregat-limit/m-p/42252#M9930</guid>
      <dc:creator>igor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-11T08:21:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

