<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Question Performance EF280 in EF &amp; E-Series, SANtricity, and Related Plug-ins</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148205#M1120</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Has a support case for this issue also been initiated with DataCore?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 18:31:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kkemnitz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-02T18:31:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question Performance EF280</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148168#M1116</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we have an EF-280 wit 48 SSD Disks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We created 2 Volumes - Raid 6 - workload: other workload&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"each" shelf one volume&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;directoly connected to DataCore Server (Windows) via 32 GB FC&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;These volumes are in an diskpool on Datacore served to ESXi Hosts&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We got 150 MB/s and ~ 2000 IO/s&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On other existing storages - like QNAP with SSD via ISCSI to Datacore -&amp;gt; ESXi - we got around 20.000 IO/s&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So - what is wrong in our configuration ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:35:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148168#M1116</guid>
      <dc:creator>ITSystemsQAM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T12:35:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question Performance EF280</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148173#M1117</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's possible that you are experiencing performance degradation as a result of delayed ACK being enabled on the host-side. This is referenced in the KB available at&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1074155/~/performance-degradation-with-data-assurance-enabled-volumes-and-iscsi-" target="_self"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1074155/~/performance-degradation-with-data-assurance-enabled-volumes-and-iscsi-&lt;/A&gt;. Can you try following the steps to disable delayed ACK and verify if performance has improved?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 15:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148173#M1117</guid>
      <dc:creator>kkemnitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-30T15:42:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question Performance EF280</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148194#M1118</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we are using the FC Adapter directly connected to the Datacore Server.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We do not use ISCSI&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So - should we test this ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 07:26:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148194#M1118</guid>
      <dc:creator>ITSystemsQAM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-02T07:26:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question Performance EF280</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148198#M1119</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I apologize, as I overlooked that statement earlier in the initial post. Please disregard my post about iSCSI.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 12:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148198#M1119</guid>
      <dc:creator>kkemnitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-02T12:33:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question Performance EF280</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148205#M1120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Has a support case for this issue also been initiated with DataCore?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 18:31:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148205#M1120</guid>
      <dc:creator>kkemnitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-02T18:31:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question Performance EF280</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148480#M1121</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you haven't contacted Support (best way forward), you could create a small disk and present it directly to a non-Datacore FC client, and perform IO from it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Maybe also check clients and FC switches for errorrs or other problems with the ports/cables involved.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 02:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Question-Performance-EF280/m-p/148480#M1121</guid>
      <dc:creator>elementx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-15T02:52:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

