<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Not all LUN's are visible on HBA's in EF &amp; E-Series, SANtricity, and Related Plug-ins</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/146008#M724</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The issue is solved. There was a configuration error in our multipath.conf: A regular expression for matching the first SCSI-Device "sda" was also matching the devices "sdaa", "sdab", "sdac" and so on.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:24:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sanadmin_do</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-18T06:24:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Not all LUN's are visible on HBA's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/145359#M702</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;We use four Linux servers, with SLES 11 SP4, in our backup environment.&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;Two servers are connected via FC with two E2700s (FW 8.40.30.03).&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;The two other servers are connected via FC with two E2800 (FW 11.50).&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;Our problem: Not all LUN's are recognized by the built-in HBA's.&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;Despite restarting all the systems, the driver and the FW of the HBA's update remains at the problem.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Here's an example:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;tsm61_cdata_002 (3600a098000af37c20000029a5a24aa4f) dm-66 NETAPP,INF-01-00&lt;BR /&gt;size=3.0T features='4 queue_if_no_path pg_init_retries 50 retain_attached_hw_handle' hwhandler='1 rdac' wp=rw&lt;BR /&gt;|-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=14 status=active&lt;BR /&gt;| |- 7:0:2:15 sdhi 133:128 active ready running&lt;BR /&gt;| `- 9:0:3:15 sdih 135:16&amp;nbsp; active ready running&lt;BR /&gt;`-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=9 status=enabled&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; |- 7:0:3:15 sdgj 131:240 active ready running&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; `- 9:0:2:15 sdel 128:208 active ready running&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;tsm61_data_001 (3600a098000af32d60000026c5a24ab38) dm-7 NETAPP,INF-01-00&lt;BR /&gt;size=3.0T features='4 queue_if_no_path pg_init_retries 50 retain_attached_hw_handle' hwhandler='1 rdac' wp=rw&lt;BR /&gt;|-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=14 status=active&lt;BR /&gt;| |- 7:0:0:15 sdbo 68:32&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; active ready running&lt;BR /&gt;| `- 9:0:0:15 sdq&amp;nbsp; 65:0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; active ready running&lt;BR /&gt;`-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=9 status=enabled&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; `- 7:0:1:15 sdcn 69:176&amp;nbsp; active ready running&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;tsm71_data_010 (3600a098000af37c2000002b35a24ac3c) dm-70 NETAPP,INF-01-00&lt;BR /&gt;size=3.0T features='4 queue_if_no_path pg_init_retries 50 retain_attached_hw_handle' hwhandler='1 rdac' wp=rw&lt;BR /&gt;|-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=14 status=active&lt;BR /&gt;| |- 9:0:3:12 sdie 134:224 active ready running&lt;BR /&gt;| `- 7:0:2:12 sdhf 133:80&amp;nbsp; active ready running&lt;BR /&gt;`-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=9 status=enabled&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; |- 7:0:3:12 sdgg 131:192 active ready running&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; `- 9:0:2:12 sdei 128:160 active ready running&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;tsm71_cdata_005 (3600a098000af32d60000027b5a24ad7c) dm-20 NETAPP,INF-01-00&lt;BR /&gt;size=3.0T features='4 queue_if_no_path pg_init_retries 50 retain_attached_hw_handle' hwhandler='1 rdac' wp=rw&lt;BR /&gt;|-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=14 status=active&lt;BR /&gt;| |- 7:0:0:5&amp;nbsp; sdbe 67:128&amp;nbsp; active ready running&lt;BR /&gt;| `- 9:0:0:5&amp;nbsp; sdg&amp;nbsp; 8:96&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; active ready running&lt;BR /&gt;`-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=9 status=enabled&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; `- 7:0:1:5&amp;nbsp; sdcd 69:16&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; active ready running&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Does anyone have any idea where the mistake could be?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/145359#M702</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanadmin_do</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:01:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not all LUN's are visible on HBA's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/145369#M703</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Either zoning &amp;nbsp;or lun mapping &amp;nbsp;might &amp;nbsp;be the problem&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/145369#M703</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zubrania</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-13T13:17:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not all LUN's are visible on HBA's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/145370#M704</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;We've reviewed zoning several times, including OnCommand Insight.&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;This is fine.&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;It can not be the LUN mapping, nothing has changed.&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;The problem arose after the storage systems were restarted due to the FW update.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:24:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/145370#M704</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanadmin_do</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-13T13:24:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not all LUN's are visible on HBA's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/145517#M709</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have you sorted out the issue ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 14:00:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/145517#M709</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zubrania</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-20T14:00:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not all LUN's are visible on HBA's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/145982#M718</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/36388"&gt;@Zubrania&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;No, we still have the problem&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;. &lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;In the meantime, we tried to solve it with NetApp 1st and 2nd Level Support, without success.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;The zoning we have already checked several times, there everything is okay.&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;We have also checked the settings on the part of the Linux server and adjusted according to specifications of NetApp, no solution to the problem.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="tlid-translation translation"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;We're thankful for any hint.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:15:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/145982#M718</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanadmin_do</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-17T10:15:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not all LUN's are visible on HBA's</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/146008#M724</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The issue is solved. There was a configuration error in our multipath.conf: A regular expression for matching the first SCSI-Device "sda" was also matching the devices "sdaa", "sdab", "sdac" and so on.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:24:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/Not-all-LUN-s-are-visible-on-HBA-s/m-p/146008#M724</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanadmin_do</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-18T06:24:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

