<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EF570 performance degarde when ssd fail in EF &amp; E-Series, SANtricity, and Related Plug-ins</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/EF570-performance-degarde-when-ssd-fail/m-p/148091#M751</link>
    <description>Hi expert
Could you help answer the question?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 06:44:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stevenzhang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-24T06:44:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EF570 performance degarde when ssd fail</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/EF570-performance-degarde-when-ssd-fail/m-p/148073#M749</link>
      <description>Hi expert
We found EF570 performance reduce 50% when one ssd fail.
Is it normal?
Our enviorment is 120 ssd, ssd size 3.2T, DDP pool, each pool 60 disk, io size 32k, read/write percent 7:3.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:36:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/EF570-performance-degarde-when-ssd-fail/m-p/148073#M749</guid>
      <dc:creator>stevenzhang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T12:36:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF570 performance degarde when ssd fail</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/EF570-performance-degarde-when-ssd-fail/m-p/148091#M751</link>
      <description>Hi expert
Could you help answer the question?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 06:44:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/EF570-performance-degarde-when-ssd-fail/m-p/148091#M751</guid>
      <dc:creator>stevenzhang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-24T06:44:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF570 performance degarde when ssd fail</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/EF570-performance-degarde-when-ssd-fail/m-p/148101#M752</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/73383"&gt;@stevenzhang&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you can reference this figure for performance degrade.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And you can try to modify the&amp;nbsp;reconstruction priority to reduce the performance degrade during DDP rebuild.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4652.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4652.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ddp.png" style="width: 563px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8982i309301B71DDBF37A/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="ddp.png" alt="ddp.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="DDP2.png" style="width: 601px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8983i9354562F5F8D196A/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="DDP2.png" alt="DDP2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/EF-E-Series-SANtricity-and-Related-Plug-ins/EF570-performance-degarde-when-ssd-fail/m-p/148101#M752</guid>
      <dc:creator>christsai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-24T13:16:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

