<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Create one or two SVMs (FC type) for virtual machines on a two-node cluster? in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Create-one-or-two-SVMs-FC-type-for-virtual-machines-on-a-two-node-cluster/m-p/161001#M10487</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Nope a single FC SVM will be just fine.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If controller 1 fails.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;controller 2 will assume serving out controller 1's data.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The aggr/vol/luns will failover to 2.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The SVM root vol will just go with whatever aggr it's on.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SVMs live across the entire cluster,&amp;nbsp; so even if you make this a 4 node,&amp;nbsp; the SVMs will be across all 4,&amp;nbsp; it's&amp;nbsp;irrelevant where the SVM_root volume is.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also to note; The FC LIF will not failover,&amp;nbsp; why it's important to have Multipathing;&amp;nbsp; each controller needs to be connected to each switch as well.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 18:12:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SpindleNinja</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-05T18:12:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Create one or two SVMs (FC type) for virtual machines on a two-node cluster?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Create-one-or-two-SVMs-FC-type-for-virtual-machines-on-a-two-node-cluster/m-p/160995#M10485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="VIiyi"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="JLqJ4b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ru" data-phrase-index="0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello! &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="VIiyi"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="JLqJ4b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ru" data-phrase-index="0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There is a NetApp FAS2750 24 HDD (two nodes, Cluster Mode).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="VIiyi"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="JLqJ4b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ru" data-phrase-index="0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Accordingly, two aggregations have been created: agg1 at node 1 and aggr2 at node 2. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="VIiyi"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="JLqJ4b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ru" data-phrase-index="0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Svm0 (FC type) was created to host virtual machines VMware. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="VIiyi"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="JLqJ4b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ru" data-phrase-index="0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The root of this svm0 is located at aggr2 (on node 2). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="VIiyi"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="JLqJ4b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ru" data-phrase-index="0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;On this svm0, volumes have been created: volume 1 on node 1 (aggr1) and volume 2 on node 2 (aggr2). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="VIiyi"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="JLqJ4b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ru" data-phrase-index="0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;LUNs were created on these volumes and presented to ESXi servers. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="VIiyi"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="JLqJ4b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ru" data-phrase-index="0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Accordingly, we have some of the virtual machines on node 1 (aggr1-&amp;gt;volume 1-&amp;gt;LUN1)), and some of the virtual machines on node 2 (aggr2-&amp;gt;volume 2-&amp;gt;LUN2). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="VIiyi"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="JLqJ4b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ru" data-phrase-index="0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thus, if we lose node 1 with all of its disks, then we will have node 2 with its aggregation and with its volume and LUN. And some of the virtual machines that were on LUN2 will continue to work. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="VIiyi"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="JLqJ4b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ru" data-phrase-index="0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But it worries me that the svm0 root is only on aggr2 (node ​​2). So, if we lose node 2 with all its disks, we will generally lose all svm0 and all virtual machines? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="VIiyi"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="JLqJ4b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ru" data-phrase-index="0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can it be more correct to do two svm: one svm with its own root on each node (each aggregation)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:46:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Create-one-or-two-SVMs-FC-type-for-virtual-machines-on-a-two-node-cluster/m-p/160995#M10485</guid>
      <dc:creator>areti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:46:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Create one or two SVMs (FC type) for virtual machines on a two-node cluster?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Create-one-or-two-SVMs-FC-type-for-virtual-machines-on-a-two-node-cluster/m-p/161001#M10487</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nope a single FC SVM will be just fine.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If controller 1 fails.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;controller 2 will assume serving out controller 1's data.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The aggr/vol/luns will failover to 2.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The SVM root vol will just go with whatever aggr it's on.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SVMs live across the entire cluster,&amp;nbsp; so even if you make this a 4 node,&amp;nbsp; the SVMs will be across all 4,&amp;nbsp; it's&amp;nbsp;irrelevant where the SVM_root volume is.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also to note; The FC LIF will not failover,&amp;nbsp; why it's important to have Multipathing;&amp;nbsp; each controller needs to be connected to each switch as well.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 18:12:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Create-one-or-two-SVMs-FC-type-for-virtual-machines-on-a-two-node-cluster/m-p/161001#M10487</guid>
      <dc:creator>SpindleNinja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-05T18:12:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

