<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AFF A800 - Failover in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/AFF-A800-Failover/m-p/430412#M11066</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Regarding #2 &amp;amp; #3:&amp;nbsp; 32Gb FC is specified, so (unless you sell them an all SAN array) the multipathing will be ALUA. Each host will have paths to each node, and in a node or path failure, the host will retry failed I/O to alternate paths. The retry is at the driver level, so the application doesn't see it, only some additional latency for the (in theory one) I/O operation that experiences the failure.&amp;nbsp; Subsequent I/O happens on the alternate path(s) until the node or path recovers. None is queued.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But these questions, along with the DC and DR notations, make me suspect that they are thinking of a pair of systems, as in a metrocluster.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 22:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ZaphodBbx</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-22T22:29:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AFF A800 - Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/AFF-A800-Failover/m-p/170355#M11014</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have recently responded to a banking customer for their RFP and they have reverted with queries as below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Proposed Solution -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFF A800 with 15.3TB NVMe SSD [ 48 x 15.3TB for DC and 24 x 15.3TB for DR ]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;32Gbps FC ports&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Queries&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Maximum time taken by the storage to resume operations in terms of Failover ? Any Test results will help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. During the failover period , will the requests coming in from Hosts be Queued ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. What is the recommended practice to configure Multipathing at VM 's level ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. Do we have any performance numbers at various Cached Hit and Cache Miss levels ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:12:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/AFF-A800-Failover/m-p/170355#M11014</guid>
      <dc:creator>sandeepthots</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:12:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AFF A800 - Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/AFF-A800-Failover/m-p/170402#M11017</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1. during successful takeover, operations should experience no disruption therefore there's no time taken to resume operations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. During failover writes are sent to the HA partner and flushed to their respective aggregates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Not sure what the question is here. Are you referring to a VMware host? a VMware guest? what protocol are we using and what is the operating system?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4.What is the specifics you're looking for in terms of cache hit/miss?&amp;nbsp; we track cache hits and misses in statistical data, and there are a few tools that are available to track the data.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 04:53:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/AFF-A800-Failover/m-p/170402#M11017</guid>
      <dc:creator>aladd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-29T04:53:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AFF A800 - Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/AFF-A800-Failover/m-p/170443#M11018</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;3. Multipathing isn't done at guest VM level but host OS on SAN client side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:50:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/AFF-A800-Failover/m-p/170443#M11018</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul_stejskal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-30T12:50:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AFF A800 - Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/AFF-A800-Failover/m-p/430412#M11066</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Regarding #2 &amp;amp; #3:&amp;nbsp; 32Gb FC is specified, so (unless you sell them an all SAN array) the multipathing will be ALUA. Each host will have paths to each node, and in a node or path failure, the host will retry failed I/O to alternate paths. The retry is at the driver level, so the application doesn't see it, only some additional latency for the (in theory one) I/O operation that experiences the failure.&amp;nbsp; Subsequent I/O happens on the alternate path(s) until the node or path recovers. None is queued.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But these questions, along with the DC and DR notations, make me suspect that they are thinking of a pair of systems, as in a metrocluster.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 22:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/AFF-A800-Failover/m-p/430412#M11066</guid>
      <dc:creator>ZaphodBbx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-22T22:29:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

