<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FAS3160 downgrade to FAS3040 in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3160-downgrade-to-FAS3040/m-p/17797#M1208</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have the same ammount of ports in your FAS3040, yes it is possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:03:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-11T13:03:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FAS3160 downgrade to FAS3040</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3160-downgrade-to-FAS3040/m-p/17792#M1207</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible use FAS3040HA replace FAS3160HA controllers?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:08:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3160-downgrade-to-FAS3040/m-p/17792#M1207</guid>
      <dc:creator>kwana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:08:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS3160 downgrade to FAS3040</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3160-downgrade-to-FAS3040/m-p/17797#M1208</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have the same ammount of ports in your FAS3040, yes it is possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:03:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3160-downgrade-to-FAS3040/m-p/17797#M1208</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-11T13:03:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS3160 downgrade to FAS3040</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3160-downgrade-to-FAS3040/m-p/17802#M1209</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Amount of ports does not really the main criterion. What matters, is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-          Both filers run compatible Data ONTAP versions, so one can access disks taken from another&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-          Number of disks and shelves and total amount of storage do not exceed platform limit, taken in account of course how many shelves you can connect to a single loop and how many loops you can build (here is where number of ports starts to matter).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If all this is checked, it is trivial enough head swap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:55:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3160-downgrade-to-FAS3040/m-p/17802#M1209</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-11T13:55:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

