<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FAS3210C (8.1.1) and DS4243 - RAID Group Size and Hot Spares? in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3210C-8-1-1-and-DS4243-RAID-Group-Size-and-Hot-Spares/m-p/19948#M1366</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;RAID groups are very unbalanced now (16+6), but should be fine after adding more disks (16+16+14).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:25:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-11T12:25:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FAS3210C (8.1.1) and DS4243 - RAID Group Size and Hot Spares?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3210C-8-1-1-and-DS4243-RAID-Group-Size-and-Hot-Spares/m-p/19934#M1362</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have just connected an additional shelf of 600GB 15kSAS DS4243.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently my controller which I'm adding the shelf to has 2 x RG (16 Disks) - RG0 has 16 disk and RG1 has 6 disks. That leaves 2 spare&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the best option about adding this new shelf? Do I leave the RG at 16 disks? If&amp;nbsp; I do to give best performance and balance I have to use 26 disks which leaves only 1 spare.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I increase the RG size to 23 and use 24 disks so the RG are balanced?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advanced!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:17:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3210C-8-1-1-and-DS4243-RAID-Group-Size-and-Hot-Spares/m-p/19934#M1362</guid>
      <dc:creator>dartfordbc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:17:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS3210C (8.1.1) and DS4243 - RAID Group Size and Hot Spares?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3210C-8-1-1-and-DS4243-RAID-Group-Size-and-Hot-Spares/m-p/19938#M1364</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is a dual-controller system, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you adding all 24 new disks to one of the controllers only? If you don't tweak anything, then you will end up wit a pretty neat setup IMHO:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- RG0 - 16 disks (no change)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- RG1 - 16 disks (6 old + 10 new)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- RG2 - 14 disks (all new)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- 2 hot-spares&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nothing wrong about this in my view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:51:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3210C-8-1-1-and-DS4243-RAID-Group-Size-and-Hot-Spares/m-p/19938#M1364</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-11T11:51:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS3210C (8.1.1) and DS4243 - RAID Group Size and Hot Spares?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3210C-8-1-1-and-DS4243-RAID-Group-Size-and-Hot-Spares/m-p/19943#M1365</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's correct, a dual controller system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes I'm adding all 24 new disks to one of the controllers only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help, I wanted to check it was right as the warning message about not being balanced was a little off putting!.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:11:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3210C-8-1-1-and-DS4243-RAID-Group-Size-and-Hot-Spares/m-p/19943#M1365</guid>
      <dc:creator>dartfordbc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-11T12:11:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS3210C (8.1.1) and DS4243 - RAID Group Size and Hot Spares?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3210C-8-1-1-and-DS4243-RAID-Group-Size-and-Hot-Spares/m-p/19948#M1366</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;RAID groups are very unbalanced now (16+6), but should be fine after adding more disks (16+16+14).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:25:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS3210C-8-1-1-and-DS4243-RAID-Group-Size-and-Hot-Spares/m-p/19948#M1366</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-11T12:25:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

