<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RAID disks on different channels in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31273#M2126</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ismo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nowadays, if a 72GB 10k disk dies, you get a 144GB 15k disk as replacement as 10k ones are out of stock. You can see it on the physical size value, dont worry about that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-24T21:05:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RAID disks on different channels</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31264#M2124</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have encountered a system with five FC shelves, each having dual connections to a single controller and the disks in RAID groups across these shelves are mixed between each channel, below is an example.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;Oh and yes I have noticed the RPM issue also &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://communities.netapp.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;dparity&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4b.33&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; FCAL 10000 68000/139264000 68552/140395088 &lt;BR /&gt; parity&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b.71 0b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B -&amp;nbsp; FCAL 15000 68000/139264000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 68552/140395088 &lt;BR /&gt; data 0b.81&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b 5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; FCAL 10000 68000/139264000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 69536/142410400 &lt;BR /&gt; data 0b.53&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; FCAL 15000 68000/139264000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 137104/280790184 &lt;BR /&gt; data 0b.66&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; FCAL 10000 68000/139264000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 137104/280790184 &lt;BR /&gt; data 0b.34&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; FCAL 10000 68000/139264000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 68552/140395088 &lt;BR /&gt; data 0b.51&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; FCAL 10000 68000/139264000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 68552/140395088 &lt;BR /&gt; data 4b.82&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4b 5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; FCAL 10000 68000/139264000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 69536/142410400 &lt;BR /&gt; data 0b.19&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; FCAL 15000 68000/139264000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 137422/281442144 &lt;BR /&gt; data 4b.52&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4b 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; FCAL 10000 68000/139264000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 68552/140395088 &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;Can anyone suggest why this may have been done, or how it could happen unintentionally?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;Many thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:02:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31264#M2124</guid>
      <dc:creator>larrynce01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:02:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID disks on different channels</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31268#M2125</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you see the disks trough the module B and module A.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you issue the command &amp;gt;storage show disk &amp;lt;disk-id&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;example: &amp;gt;storage show disk 0b.19&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should see two paths for it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So it's "random" which pat will be used as primary, and you see it in sysconfig -r / aggr status -r command output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have mixed rpms in the same raidgroup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;supported, not optimal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You just have to know, that 15k disks connot work in that speed, because there is also 10k disks in the same rg.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rg rpm would be 10k.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have different size of disks in the same rg, then the usable size of the disk will be mainly the smallest one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example: parity disks are 72GB:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You add 2TB disk to this aggregate, you'll lose 1,9xTB, from that disk. (parity needs to be calculated to smaller disks).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can succesfully add bigger disks to rg, if the parity disks are large enough to hold the parity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You cannot replace 72GB disk with 2TB disk. Replace command issued, it will copy the data from 72GB disk to 2TB disk and it will work as 72GB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Disk fails, and only available spare is 2TB for this broken 72G disk. ONTAP will reconstruct the disk from the paritys, and usable size will be 72GB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Br.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ismo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31268#M2125</guid>
      <dc:creator>ismopuuronen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-24T20:16:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID disks on different channels</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31273#M2126</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ismo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nowadays, if a 72GB 10k disk dies, you get a 144GB 15k disk as replacement as 10k ones are out of stock. You can see it on the physical size value, dont worry about that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31273#M2126</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-24T21:05:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID disks on different channels</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31277#M2128</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not worried about &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote jiveImage" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It was just an example what happens if you add an 15k disk to a rg where is only 10k disks, or what happens if you add bigger disk to a rg than the exsiting ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Br.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ismo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:26:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31277#M2128</guid>
      <dc:creator>ismopuuronen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-24T22:26:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID disks on different channels</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31282#M2130</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ismopuuronen, I know they are dual pathed. It's just that I'm more used to seeing the disks listed twice, once for each channel, rather than one list from a sysconfig with disks listed on only one channel, apparently at random. Is this perhaps related to this system only having one controller. All the others are HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 14:07:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31282#M2130</guid>
      <dc:creator>larrynce01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-29T14:07:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID disks on different channels</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31285#M2131</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe one of these commands helps you?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;sysconfig -r shows where the disks belongs and the active path, it also shows if there are partner disks.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;sysconfig -a shows disks twice and more, where the shelfs are connected etc.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;storage show disk -p could be what you are looking for now?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;disk show -v is good way to determine ownership of the disks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Br.&lt;BR /&gt;Ismo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 16:35:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31285#M2131</guid>
      <dc:creator>ismopuuronen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-29T16:35:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID disks on different channels</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31292#M2134</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pretty sure I know the ownership (one controller &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;).&amp;nbsp; It was more the question of since some disks show on 4b and some on 0b I was wondering if the I/O across aggr was also along these channels, so priority differs between disks in an aggr, or even if it was possible to define the I/O path per disk though given the way the systems work I can't see the point on a single controller setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 11:02:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31292#M2134</guid>
      <dc:creator>larrynce01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-30T11:02:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID disks on different channels</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31296#M2136</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;netapp supports 2 pathes to a disk but will only activly use 1. So it will pull half of the disk i/o through way a and other half through way b. if one path dies, it might switch over to way a only, you can correct that using "stoarge load balance" and it will go 50/50 again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:13:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31296#M2136</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-05T15:13:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID disks on different channels</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31305#M2139</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Thomas,&amp;nbsp; I'm still a little uncertain why the disks are unevenly distributed across two channels on a single controller but it seems to be working. I would have expected them to report the channel on which I/O is actually running or if load balanced to see a 50/50 distribution. It's an inherited system so it may have achieved its current state over time. I'll try load balance and see if everything returns to a more coherent state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:34:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/RAID-disks-on-different-channels/m-p/31305#M2139</guid>
      <dc:creator>larrynce01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-05T15:34:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

