<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Poor performance on V3240 in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Poor-performance-on-V3240/m-p/39408#M2690</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have just built a new environment with 2 x V3240’s. Installation appeared all OK but system admins are experiencing problems with performance from hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The environment is 100% Solaris 10 (SPARC) and connected via a 1Gb dedicated storage VLAN. Storage is presented over NFS to the Solaris hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL style="list-style-type: decimal;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Copying a large file from local storage on UNIX server A to the NetApp volume provides good performance.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Copying a large file from the NetApp volume to UNIX server B local storage provides good performance&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Making a duplicate of the file in the filesystem provides poor performance. This is 3 times slower than 1 and 2 above. E.g. volume mounted on unix box and standard cp command used to create a duplicate of the file.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are struggling to identify the cause. The configuration looks OK and we can prove performance is OK on bulk read/writes described above. The end storage and SAN fabric show no issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone seen a similar situation on V-series in an NFS only environment?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:16:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ANDY_PIGGOTT</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:16:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Poor performance on V3240</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Poor-performance-on-V3240/m-p/39408#M2690</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have just built a new environment with 2 x V3240’s. Installation appeared all OK but system admins are experiencing problems with performance from hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The environment is 100% Solaris 10 (SPARC) and connected via a 1Gb dedicated storage VLAN. Storage is presented over NFS to the Solaris hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL style="list-style-type: decimal;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Copying a large file from local storage on UNIX server A to the NetApp volume provides good performance.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Copying a large file from the NetApp volume to UNIX server B local storage provides good performance&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Making a duplicate of the file in the filesystem provides poor performance. This is 3 times slower than 1 and 2 above. E.g. volume mounted on unix box and standard cp command used to create a duplicate of the file.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are struggling to identify the cause. The configuration looks OK and we can prove performance is OK on bulk read/writes described above. The end storage and SAN fabric show no issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone seen a similar situation on V-series in an NFS only environment?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:16:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Poor-performance-on-V3240/m-p/39408#M2690</guid>
      <dc:creator>ANDY_PIGGOTT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:16:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor performance on V3240</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Poor-performance-on-V3240/m-p/39413#M2691</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. local to netapp, one way transfer, 110mb/sec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. netapp to local, one way transfer, 110mb/sec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. netapp to same netapp, two way transfer, read and write from same source, packet &amp;amp; protocol overhead +-40mb/sec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems fine for me as you are only using 1gbit ethernet?!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:33:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Poor-performance-on-V3240/m-p/39413#M2691</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-24T18:33:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

