<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Odd Numbered RAID-DP Group in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Odd-Numbered-RAID-DP-Group/m-p/44645#M3100</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there anything inherently wrong with having an odd number of disks (17, to be exact), in a RAID-DP group? I would think you should be able to do it, but I've only ever heard folks discuss even numbers when discussing RAID-DP groups. I've done RAID 5-5 with three disks before, but am new to RAID-DP, with the second parity disk, and I wondered, even if it is allowable, if it's a good idea or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Feel free to insult me, so long as you provide an answer. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:59:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mkunkel_dowlohnes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:59:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Odd Numbered RAID-DP Group</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Odd-Numbered-RAID-DP-Group/m-p/44645#M3100</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there anything inherently wrong with having an odd number of disks (17, to be exact), in a RAID-DP group? I would think you should be able to do it, but I've only ever heard folks discuss even numbers when discussing RAID-DP groups. I've done RAID 5-5 with three disks before, but am new to RAID-DP, with the second parity disk, and I wondered, even if it is allowable, if it's a good idea or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Feel free to insult me, so long as you provide an answer. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:59:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Odd-Numbered-RAID-DP-Group/m-p/44645#M3100</guid>
      <dc:creator>mkunkel_dowlohnes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:59:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Odd Numbered RAID-DP Group</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Odd-Numbered-RAID-DP-Group/m-p/44650#M3101</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nothing wrong with it and you should be able to have anything you like as long as you don't violate the max value. My FAS2050 has 2 RAID groups of 13 and has done so for the last couple of years. I believe that&amp;nbsp; Netapp will recommend that you leave RAID groups size at default though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:53:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Odd-Numbered-RAID-DP-Group/m-p/44650#M3101</guid>
      <dc:creator>jb2cool01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-17T18:53:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

