<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FAS2220 12 Disk in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2220-12-Disk/m-p/46054#M3179</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes basically controller2 is a hot standby. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think we've settled on &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;8 Disks on controller1 5 Data 2 Parity and 1 Spare&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4 Disks on controller2 1 Data 2 Parity and 1 Spare&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The main reason is the non disruptive firmware like you mentioned &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 14:05:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CHRIS_LAWRENCE</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-09T14:05:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FAS2220 12 Disk</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2220-12-Disk/m-p/46045#M3175</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just looking for peoples opinion on the following disk configuration for a new install. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: Helvetica;"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;Assign 9 disk&amp;nbsp; to controller A create raiddp aggr &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: Helvetica;"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;aggr0 - 8 (6data-2 parity) 1 spare &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: Helvetica;"&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;assign 3 disk&amp;nbsp; controller B&amp;nbsp; create raid4 aggr&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: Helvetica;"&gt;aggr0- 2 disk (1data-1 parity) 1 spare&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #000000; font-family: Helvetica;"&gt;Looking to maximse disk space whilst still keeping it fairly best practice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2220-12-Disk/m-p/46045#M3175</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS_LAWRENCE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:46:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2220 12 Disk</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2220-12-Disk/m-p/46049#M3177</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So basically the second filer is a hot standby?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We made a large storage purchase and NetApp "threw in" three "free" FAS2220 12-disk pairs.&amp;nbsp; With 12 disks for a pair of filers, they're basically next to useless.&amp;nbsp; By the time you take out two disks for spares, 4 disks for dp parity, you are left with 6 data disks (7 if you do raid-4 on one head like above).&amp;nbsp; We thought long and hard about how to distribute the disks, and we settled on evenly distributing them between the two controllers, so as to be able to take advantage of the processing power of each filer.&amp;nbsp; 6 disks on each filer:&amp;nbsp; 1 spare, 5 disk raid-dp aggr0.&amp;nbsp; We shrunk vol0 as much as we could to free up more space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As much as we hate wasting disks with raid-dp, it makes upgrading firmware non-disruptive and that's why we use raid-dp everywhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 13:54:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2220-12-Disk/m-p/46049#M3177</guid>
      <dc:creator>resqme914</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-09T13:54:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2220 12 Disk</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2220-12-Disk/m-p/46054#M3179</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes basically controller2 is a hot standby. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think we've settled on &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;8 Disks on controller1 5 Data 2 Parity and 1 Spare&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4 Disks on controller2 1 Data 2 Parity and 1 Spare&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The main reason is the non disruptive firmware like you mentioned &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 14:05:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/FAS2220-12-Disk/m-p/46054#M3179</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS_LAWRENCE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-09T14:05:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

