topic Re: Implications on changing failover detection in ONTAP Hardware https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Implications-on-changing-failover-detection/m-p/46365#M3192 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Largest issue would be false takeovers I think....have you looked at the 7.3.1 RLM-assisted failover enhancements?</P><P></P><P>(This sounds similar to a discussion we had recently with a customer who required sub 15 second failover times....challenging with the current active/active cluster failover setup.)</P></BODY></HTML> Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:37:14 GMT amiller_1 2009-04-25T03:37:14Z Implications on changing failover detection https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Implications-on-changing-failover-detection/m-p/46360#M3191 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>If a pair of FAS clusters is configured to detect failover (much faster than default), what are the implications on doing so?</P><P></P><P>Specifically, what implications would there be to change cf.takeover.detection.seconds to 1?</P></BODY></HTML> Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:28:49 GMT https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Implications-on-changing-failover-detection/m-p/46360#M3191 shiozaki 2025-06-05T07:28:49Z Re: Implications on changing failover detection https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Implications-on-changing-failover-detection/m-p/46365#M3192 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Largest issue would be false takeovers I think....have you looked at the 7.3.1 RLM-assisted failover enhancements?</P><P></P><P>(This sounds similar to a discussion we had recently with a customer who required sub 15 second failover times....challenging with the current active/active cluster failover setup.)</P></BODY></HTML> Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:37:14 GMT https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Implications-on-changing-failover-detection/m-p/46365#M3192 amiller_1 2009-04-25T03:37:14Z