<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performances: FAS2040HA + DS4243 (24x 450GB 15k RPM): expected maximum I/O ? in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performances-FAS2040HA-DS4243-24x-450GB-15k-RPM-expected-maximum-I-O/m-p/4899#M341</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi JNV,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a bit "how long is a piece of string?" question...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's the size of the IO? Is it random or sequential? What latency is acceptable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a rule of thumb, for short (4K or 8K) IO &amp;amp; reasonable latency (sub-20ms), each 'active' 15k spindle should deliver somewhere in the range of 180-220 IOPS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;'Active' spindles are your data drives, but not parity &amp;amp; hot spares, so as an example you may have following allocation (per each controller):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- 8 x data + 2x parity + 2x hot-spare&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:51:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-08T10:51:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performances: FAS2040HA + DS4243 (24x 450GB 15k RPM): expected maximum I/O ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performances-FAS2040HA-DS4243-24x-450GB-15k-RPM-expected-maximum-I-O/m-p/4894#M340</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know the maximum I/O that I can expect with a &lt;STRONG&gt;FAS2040HA attached to a DS4243 (24x 450GB 15k RPM SAS drives).&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will run 20 VMs (vSphere 4.1) in NFS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for the feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JNV&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:39:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performances-FAS2040HA-DS4243-24x-450GB-15k-RPM-expected-maximum-I-O/m-p/4894#M340</guid>
      <dc:creator>neves_jacques</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:39:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performances: FAS2040HA + DS4243 (24x 450GB 15k RPM): expected maximum I/O ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performances-FAS2040HA-DS4243-24x-450GB-15k-RPM-expected-maximum-I-O/m-p/4899#M341</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi JNV,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a bit "how long is a piece of string?" question...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's the size of the IO? Is it random or sequential? What latency is acceptable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a rule of thumb, for short (4K or 8K) IO &amp;amp; reasonable latency (sub-20ms), each 'active' 15k spindle should deliver somewhere in the range of 180-220 IOPS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;'Active' spindles are your data drives, but not parity &amp;amp; hot spares, so as an example you may have following allocation (per each controller):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- 8 x data + 2x parity + 2x hot-spare&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:51:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performances-FAS2040HA-DS4243-24x-450GB-15k-RPM-expected-maximum-I-O/m-p/4899#M341</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-08T10:51:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performances: FAS2040HA + DS4243 (24x 450GB 15k RPM): expected maximum I/O ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performances-FAS2040HA-DS4243-24x-450GB-15k-RPM-expected-maximum-I-O/m-p/4903#M342</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek is correct,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; However this is a base number, system caching also contributes to the IOP profile as well.&amp;nbsp; We have seen IOPs far in excess of what appears to be possible because the system has the data cached and is providing numbers higher than just the "spindle speed x count" would allow for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; - Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:20:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performances-FAS2040HA-DS4243-24x-450GB-15k-RPM-expected-maximum-I-O/m-p/4903#M342</guid>
      <dc:creator>columbus_admin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-13T19:20:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

