<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maximum space used for an Aggregate in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Maximum-space-used-for-an-Aggregate/m-p/53766#M3809</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;above 90% usage you will have performance degradation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now it depends if you have enabled thin provisioning or not. if you don't use thin provisioning, it may show a 99% full aggregate with df -A,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but you may still have space left.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you use thin provisioning, then don't go over 90%! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;have a look at aggr show_space (-h), there you can see the usable space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and keep an eye on the snapshots. maybe there are old snapshots to delete on the volumes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:14:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DOMINIC_WYSS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-13T08:14:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maximum space used for an Aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Maximum-space-used-for-an-Aggregate/m-p/53756#M3805</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all, I have a question about how much space of an Aggregate can be used, what the best practice is. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently have a SAN with 4 Aggregates. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Aggr0 is the system aggregate, 96% is used of this aggregate. &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Aggr1 is devided between cifs and vols, 99% of this aggregate is being used.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Aggr2 is devided between cifs and vols and 95% of this aggregate is being used.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Aggr3 still has 6TB of space left and will be fully utilized in the near future.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is, is there a maximum usage of space for an aggregate? For the last couple of days I'm getting the message 'Critical: Aggregate aggr1_01 on node "name" is 99% used' and 'Critical: Aggregate aggr2_02 on node "name" is 95% used'. Nothing has happened yet, no deteriozation of speed or anything like that. I think the alarm threshold has been put in by the company who helped us setting up the SAN. But I was wondering what the best practice is for an Aggregate space usages.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope to hear from you soon and thank you for your time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;André&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:31:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Maximum-space-used-for-an-Aggregate/m-p/53756#M3805</guid>
      <dc:creator>aclaus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:31:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maximum space used for an Aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Maximum-space-used-for-an-Aggregate/m-p/53761#M3807</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We strive for high utilization and get nervous at 95% or above.&amp;nbsp; If you are thin provisioning, like we do then I really try not to go above 95%.&amp;nbsp; With that said we only see performance issues when its 99% or more full.&amp;nbsp; You may have aggregate snapshots on and you can usually get 5% back.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FAS3070*&amp;gt; snap sched -A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aggregate aggr64: 0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FAS3070*&amp;gt; snap reserve -A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aggregate aggr64: current snapshot reserve is 0% or 0 k-bytes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have aggregate snapreserve, was 5% default for quite some time, you can change that to 0 and then set the aggregate snap shot schedule to 0 0 0.&amp;nbsp; You don't need aggregate snapshots, they are only used for Metrocluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 08:02:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Maximum-space-used-for-an-Aggregate/m-p/53761#M3807</guid>
      <dc:creator>clackamas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-08T08:02:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maximum space used for an Aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Maximum-space-used-for-an-Aggregate/m-p/53766#M3809</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;above 90% usage you will have performance degradation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now it depends if you have enabled thin provisioning or not. if you don't use thin provisioning, it may show a 99% full aggregate with df -A,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but you may still have space left.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you use thin provisioning, then don't go over 90%! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;have a look at aggr show_space (-h), there you can see the usable space.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and keep an eye on the snapshots. maybe there are old snapshots to delete on the volumes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:14:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Maximum-space-used-for-an-Aggregate/m-p/53766#M3809</guid>
      <dc:creator>DOMINIC_WYSS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T08:14:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

