<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cluster Failover Question in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Cluster-Failover-Question/m-p/57363#M4009</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the planed setup, the filer will failover if you loose a cable, gbic or esh module! you have online volumes and online aggregates in that machine, if you loose connectivity to the disks you will have a multiple disk missing error and the filer will panic!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you might consider buying a FAS2020 with internal S-ATA disks for the purpose of "just a bit plain disk storage" instead of endangering your productive HA-system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-12T11:00:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cluster Failover Question</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Cluster-Failover-Question/m-p/57348#M4006</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a customer that has a filer cluster with 2 stacks that are MP-HA.&amp;nbsp; He wants to add another stack that will serve only as a backup and, for various reasons, wants to connect it non-MP-HA, that is only one connection to one filer head and another connection to another filer head.&amp;nbsp; He also does not want the filer to failover due to a shelf/cable/GBic issue on the backup stack/loop.&amp;nbsp; Now, if we leave the default cf.takeover.on_disk_shelf_miscompare to "off", if we loose a cable, GBic, or ESH module on the backup stack, the cluster will not fail over.&amp;nbsp; Is this thinking correct, or am I missing something?&amp;nbsp; Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:43:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Cluster-Failover-Question/m-p/57348#M4006</guid>
      <dc:creator>kofchur</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:43:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cluster Failover Question</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Cluster-Failover-Question/m-p/57351#M4007</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That sounds correct; as long as they're aware that if either controller loses connectivity to the shelf, then they will not be able to access data in volumes based on disks in that stack.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is also the case that if either controller loses connectivity to the stack and an aggregate goes offline because of it, the controller will panic which could trigger a takeover anyway depending on if the cf.takeover.on_panic option is enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:28:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Cluster-Failover-Question/m-p/57351#M4007</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-12T00:28:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster Failover Question</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Cluster-Failover-Question/m-p/57358#M4008</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;cf.takeover.on_disk_shelf_miscompare is ignored for software based disk ownership (should should be default today).  So you are correct – as long as filer does not have online aggregate on the shelf, it should not panic and imitate failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:50:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Cluster-Failover-Question/m-p/57358#M4008</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-12T10:50:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster Failover Question</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Cluster-Failover-Question/m-p/57363#M4009</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the planed setup, the filer will failover if you loose a cable, gbic or esh module! you have online volumes and online aggregates in that machine, if you loose connectivity to the disks you will have a multiple disk missing error and the filer will panic!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you might consider buying a FAS2020 with internal S-ATA disks for the purpose of "just a bit plain disk storage" instead of endangering your productive HA-system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Cluster-Failover-Question/m-p/57363#M4009</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-12T11:00:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

