<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Convert MetroCluster in ordinary HA Pair in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59672#M4153</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey everyone, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have a metrocluster which seems to be setup normally. Aggr0 is mirrored between the filers, and has only one raidgroup on each head. The original reason for creating a metrocluster is not valid anymore since the two heads are only a few meter away from each other. The filers are almost end of life, and almost out of diskspace. For budget reasons, we've decided to not buy anymore disks/shelves, but instead break the current aggregate mirrors so we free up the disks holding the copies. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for the correct way to do this, I found two methods:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Splitting the aggregate is one option, as explained here: &lt;A class="active_link" href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol" title="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I understand correctly I would have to do:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aggr split aggr0/plex2 aggr1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will split off the second plex and create a new aggregate called aggr1. I could then remove the aggregate aggr1 and add the disks to aggr0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other option is to remove the plex from the aggregate, as explained here: &lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol" title="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That would require these commands:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aggr offline plex2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aggr destroy plex2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will destroy the plex, and the disks will be turned into hot spares which can then&amp;nbsp; be added to aggr0. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the second option would save the steps to remove the newly created aggregate. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is any of these ideas wrong, am I missing something? Is there something else to consider? Both steps do not need any downtime as fas as I can see. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any comments/ideas etc please let me know!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sjoerd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:04:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SJOERDHOOFT</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:04:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Convert MetroCluster in ordinary HA Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59672#M4153</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey everyone, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have a metrocluster which seems to be setup normally. Aggr0 is mirrored between the filers, and has only one raidgroup on each head. The original reason for creating a metrocluster is not valid anymore since the two heads are only a few meter away from each other. The filers are almost end of life, and almost out of diskspace. For budget reasons, we've decided to not buy anymore disks/shelves, but instead break the current aggregate mirrors so we free up the disks holding the copies. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for the correct way to do this, I found two methods:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Splitting the aggregate is one option, as explained here: &lt;A class="active_link" href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol" title="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I understand correctly I would have to do:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aggr split aggr0/plex2 aggr1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will split off the second plex and create a new aggregate called aggr1. I could then remove the aggregate aggr1 and add the disks to aggr0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other option is to remove the plex from the aggregate, as explained here: &lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol" title="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMM1278318/html/onlinebk/protecting/task/t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol.html#t_oc_prot_sym-split-miror-aggr-or-trad-vol&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That would require these commands:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aggr offline plex2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aggr destroy plex2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will destroy the plex, and the disks will be turned into hot spares which can then&amp;nbsp; be added to aggr0. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the second option would save the steps to remove the newly created aggregate. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is any of these ideas wrong, am I missing something? Is there something else to consider? Both steps do not need any downtime as fas as I can see. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any comments/ideas etc please let me know!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sjoerd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:04:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59672#M4153</guid>
      <dc:creator>SJOERDHOOFT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:04:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Convert MetroCluster in ordinary HA Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59676#M4154</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;offline/destroy plex is fine, requires no downtime, just do a disk zero spares afterwards and you are good to go and can create new aggregates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:53:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59676#M4154</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-18T11:53:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Convert MetroCluster in ordinary HA Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59683#M4155</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it fabric or stretch MetroCluster?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:27:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59683#M4155</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-18T12:27:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Convert MetroCluster in ordinary HA Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59688#M4156</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does that change anything? Because I'm not sure what that means? I'm planning to do the offline/destroy option, does it make a difference in my case?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 07:20:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59688#M4156</guid>
      <dc:creator>SJOERDHOOFT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-19T07:20:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Convert MetroCluster in ordinary HA Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59691#M4157</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stretched MC - short distance, where you just use longer FC cables for cluster interconnect &amp;amp; disk shelves cabling&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fabric MC - longer distance, where back-end FC switches (&amp;amp; long-haul / dark fibre) are used for cluster interconnect &amp;amp; disk shelves cabling&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the latter scenario you'd probably wish to remove FC switches from the setup, which would be disruptive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:18:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59691#M4157</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-19T08:18:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Convert MetroCluster in ordinary HA Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59699#M4158</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That would be a stretched metro cluster then, so no problem for me. Thanks for the responses and help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Convert-MetroCluster-in-ordinary-HA-Pair/m-p/59699#M4158</guid>
      <dc:creator>SJOERDHOOFT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-19T08:24:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

