<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance comparaison between FAS models in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performance-comparaison-between-FAS-models/m-p/63158#M4350</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For some workloads (not all) 3240 can beat 3170, so my informed guess would be 3070 won't stand a chance against 3240 (the latter has the same amount of RAM, twice as much of NVRAM &amp;amp; definitely faster CPU comparing to the former).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:09:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-04T10:09:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance comparaison between FAS models</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performance-comparaison-between-FAS-models/m-p/63148#M4348</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any document that compare performance between FAS series and models (for example : FAS3xxx / FAS31xx / FAS32xx)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I particulary interrested in comparing performance of a &lt;STRONG&gt;FAS3240&lt;/STRONG&gt; versus a &lt;STRONG&gt;FAS3070&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Notice : I do not have access to the "Fields Portal" &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.8/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:02:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performance-comparaison-between-FAS-models/m-p/63148#M4348</guid>
      <dc:creator>storagedp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:02:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance comparaison between FAS models</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performance-comparaison-between-FAS-models/m-p/63153#M4349</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This info under NDA now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can look at SPC-1 and SPEC SFS2008 published results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:46:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performance-comparaison-between-FAS-models/m-p/63153#M4349</guid>
      <dc:creator>roman_verysell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-03T16:46:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance comparaison between FAS models</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performance-comparaison-between-FAS-models/m-p/63158#M4350</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For some workloads (not all) 3240 can beat 3170, so my informed guess would be 3070 won't stand a chance against 3240 (the latter has the same amount of RAM, twice as much of NVRAM &amp;amp; definitely faster CPU comparing to the former).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:09:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performance-comparaison-between-FAS-models/m-p/63158#M4350</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-04T10:09:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance comparaison between FAS models</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performance-comparaison-between-FAS-models/m-p/63162#M4351</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;there is a tech ontap article coming out jan 26th that will cover some of this as well. look for it here &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://communities.netapp.com/groups/tech-ontap" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/groups/tech-ontap&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; later this month.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;terri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:49:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performance-comparaison-between-FAS-models/m-p/63162#M4351</guid>
      <dc:creator>peluso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-21T16:49:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance comparaison between FAS models</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performance-comparaison-between-FAS-models/m-p/63166#M4352</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have both the FAS3070 and FAS3170 and the difference between them is massive. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="file:/C:/DOCUME%7E1/HIGGINSB/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.png" /&gt;This graph shows two Exchange 2003 luns.&amp;nbsp; Aug 2009 was when we moved them from the FAS3070 to the FAS3170.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~&amp;nbsp; Sorry no image upload.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would show a drop from 12ms to 2ms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:06:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Performance-comparaison-between-FAS-models/m-p/63166#M4352</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrendonHiggins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-21T17:06:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

