<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64158#M4412</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, after clean shutdown it should be OK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 11:24:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-31T11:24:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64130#M4407</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone confirm how you would power up a controller on its partner node if a graceful takeover did not take place? I can describe this in the following scenario below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have 2 controllers in a HA pair, controller_A and controller_B. You need to do some sort of maintenance or system move that requires both controllers to be shut down. While working on controller_B you damage the controller hardware that does not allow it to POST when powering on. Controller_A works fine and can boot successfully, so the question is how do you power on controller_A’s partner (controller_B) that has failed? Does this happen automatically after controller_A does not receive a heartbeat from controller_B?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If not can you do a partner, then boot_ontap from controller_A or similar?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;Luke&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:26:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64130#M4407</guid>
      <dc:creator>lmunro_hug</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:26:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64135#M4408</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Really good question. I don't know of a way to takeover a node that isn't up already. You would need to Rma the bad controller or use a spare controller to bring the partner up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone know a workaround?  There may be a diag method to boot the partner for takeover but I haven't seen one. I did have a use case to do this when a controller failed after maintenance as you described and we waited for the Rma controller to show up and had no other workaround from support back then..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 07:10:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64135#M4408</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T07:10:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64139#M4409</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;“takeover -f” or “forcetakeover”?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Part of problem is, it is not known whether NVRAM is clean. So user is responsible for any potential data loss …&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 07:38:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64139#M4409</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T07:38:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64148#M4410</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interesting one - we had this discussion with Luke the other day in a pub over "Storage Beers" &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="wink" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/wink.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you are saying forced takeover should do the trick? Is mailbox on disks playing any role in it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 10:19:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64148#M4410</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T10:19:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64153#M4411</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;aborzenkov,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the controllers were cleanly shutdown surely NVRAM would be flushed to disk? In this case would this be an issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luke&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 10:27:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64153#M4411</guid>
      <dc:creator>lmunro_hug</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T10:27:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64158#M4412</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, after clean shutdown it should be OK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 11:24:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64158#M4412</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T11:24:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64162#M4413</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, I have not tried it myself and I do not have systems to test. But I expect that if previous state was clean shutdown of both partners, it should work. I appreciate of someone with hardware available could test and report.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64162#M4413</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T11:27:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64167#M4414</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll have to wrangle some hardware later. With the Partner not running it has nothing to takeover unless it boots the partner in takeover mode which I haven't seen. But thinking avoit it more... Metrocluster with a site failure does sort of do this of the partner is not accessible with takeover -d working off the syncmirror plex at the live site so might work non metrocluster too. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:22:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64167#M4414</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T13:22:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64172#M4415</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was going to try on the FAS3240AE in our lab, except it has UCS boot luns on both nodes... our other SEs wouldn't like me halting a node...but I was able to get an old FAS2020A with ONTAP 7.3 and try it out.&amp;nbsp; Andrey was right...forcetakeover does bring the partner node up.&amp;nbsp; See console below... I did a halt -f on the partner node...simulating a node that didn't come up.&amp;nbsp; Then cf forcetakeover worked.&amp;nbsp; I then booted node2 and it came up waiting for giveback and I was able to cf giveback. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wasn't sure about this until testing it...glad we have this community to learn and relearn what we forget &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;node1&amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;cf status&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;node2 may be down, takeover disabled because of reason (partner halted in notakeover mode)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;node1 has disabled takeover by node2 (interconnect error)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VIA Interconnect is down (link down).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;node1&amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;cf takeover&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cf: takeover cannot be performed because of reason (partner halted in notakeover mode)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;node1&amp;gt; c&lt;STRONG&gt;f takeover -f&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cf: takeover cannot be performed because of reason (partner halted in notakeover mode)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;node1&amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;cf forcetakeover&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cf forcetakeover may lead to data corruption; really force a takeover? &lt;STRONG&gt;y&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cf: forcetakeover initiated by operator&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;node1(takeover)&amp;gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 21:40:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64172#M4415</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T21:40:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64181#M4416</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for trying this out, great news that you had a filer to try it on. Out of interest has anyone seen this scenario discribed in any NetApp documentation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luke&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 21:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64181#M4416</guid>
      <dc:creator>lmunro_hug</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T21:46:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64186#M4417</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not seen this documented specifically but closely for metrocluster.&amp;nbsp; I skimmed through the cluster guide (High Availability guide now) and it is documented for metrocluster with the "cf forcetakeover -d" method... so similar where the guide describes a down node and -d uses the syncmirror aggregates.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 21:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64186#M4417</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T21:51:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64190#M4418</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Awesome stuff - thanks for testing this! &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 22:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64190#M4418</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T22:37:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64194#M4419</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where is the pub you guys had the discussion at?&amp;nbsp; I could use a drink right now &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 23:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64194#M4419</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T23:09:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64199#M4420</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott, I would be more than happy to be your pub tour guide when you're on our side of the Pond! &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 23:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64199#M4420</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T23:46:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Powering up a failed controller on its partner under hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64204#M4421</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hopefully Dublin at Insight in November. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sent from my iPhone 4S&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 23:51:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Powering-up-a-failed-controller-on-its-partner-under-hardware-failure/m-p/64204#M4421</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T23:51:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

