<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Replacing disks by larger ones (II) in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Replacing-disks-by-larger-ones-II/m-p/66280#M4582</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read the KB article under &lt;A href="https://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb21090" target="_blank"&gt;https://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb21090&lt;/A&gt; because I have the task to replace some smaller disks (320GB SATA) by bigger ones (1TB SATA).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the article is written:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"However, if either parity disk was of the smaller drive size, any larger drive added to the RAID group would be downsized" - so I thought the trick is, to replace the parity disks first and then everything is fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But actually my sysconfig-r gives the following output:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RAID Disk Device HA&amp;nbsp; SHELF BAY CHAN Pool Type&amp;nbsp; RPM&amp;nbsp; Used (MB/blks)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Phys (MB/blks)&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- --------------&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; --------------&lt;BR /&gt;dparity&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c.61&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 13&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 847555/1735794176 847827/1736350304&lt;BR /&gt;parity&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.48&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 847827/1736350304&lt;BR /&gt;data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.54&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 847827/1736350304&lt;BR /&gt;data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c.19&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 274540/562258784 (replacing, copy in progress)&lt;BR /&gt;-&amp;gt; copy&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.56&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 847827/1736350304 (copy 99% completed)&lt;BR /&gt;data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.20&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 274540/562258784&lt;BR /&gt;data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c.21&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 274540/562258784&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As one can see, this seemed to work for the dparity disk, showing the full right-sized of 827GB as used, but the parity was downsized to 268GB, and because of that it is clear to me, that all the following disk are also downsized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, know I know the threads in this community like&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.netapp.com/message/22414#22414" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/message/22414#22414&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.netapp.com/message/10447#10447" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/message/10447#10447&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;stating, that it is not possible to replace disks in this way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the question then remains: why was the dparity disk not downsized to 268GB?!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And isn't there really no way to get the parity disk now replaced and sized to 827GB - because then I still believe all the other 1TB-disks would not be downsized....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Markus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mheimberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:15:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Replacing disks by larger ones (II)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Replacing-disks-by-larger-ones-II/m-p/66280#M4582</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read the KB article under &lt;A href="https://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb21090" target="_blank"&gt;https://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb21090&lt;/A&gt; because I have the task to replace some smaller disks (320GB SATA) by bigger ones (1TB SATA).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the article is written:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"However, if either parity disk was of the smaller drive size, any larger drive added to the RAID group would be downsized" - so I thought the trick is, to replace the parity disks first and then everything is fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But actually my sysconfig-r gives the following output:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RAID Disk Device HA&amp;nbsp; SHELF BAY CHAN Pool Type&amp;nbsp; RPM&amp;nbsp; Used (MB/blks)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Phys (MB/blks)&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- --------------&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; --------------&lt;BR /&gt;dparity&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c.61&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 13&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 847555/1735794176 847827/1736350304&lt;BR /&gt;parity&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.48&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 847827/1736350304&lt;BR /&gt;data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.54&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 847827/1736350304&lt;BR /&gt;data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c.19&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 274540/562258784 (replacing, copy in progress)&lt;BR /&gt;-&amp;gt; copy&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.56&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 847827/1736350304 (copy 99% completed)&lt;BR /&gt;data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.20&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 274540/562258784&lt;BR /&gt;data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c.21&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0c&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200&amp;nbsp; 274400/561971200&amp;nbsp; 274540/562258784&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As one can see, this seemed to work for the dparity disk, showing the full right-sized of 827GB as used, but the parity was downsized to 268GB, and because of that it is clear to me, that all the following disk are also downsized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, know I know the threads in this community like&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.netapp.com/message/22414#22414" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/message/22414#22414&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.netapp.com/message/10447#10447" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/message/10447#10447&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;stating, that it is not possible to replace disks in this way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the question then remains: why was the dparity disk not downsized to 268GB?!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And isn't there really no way to get the parity disk now replaced and sized to 827GB - because then I still believe all the other 1TB-disks would not be downsized....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Markus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Replacing-disks-by-larger-ones-II/m-p/66280#M4582</guid>
      <dc:creator>mheimberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:15:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacing disks by larger ones (II)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Replacing-disks-by-larger-ones-II/m-p/66286#M4583</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Replacing the parity disks won't make the data disks stay at the larger capacity...at least for a replacement.&amp;nbsp; They may stay if you just add disks to the end of the RG, but if you do any kind of replacement of a larger drive for a smaller drive, I would expect that disk to be downsized regardless of the size of the parity disks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you really want to replace smaller drives with larger ones, the right way to do it is to copy the data over, then do a cut-over.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:48:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Replacing-disks-by-larger-ones-II/m-p/66286#M4583</guid>
      <dc:creator>adamfox</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-21T19:48:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

