<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Semi-Nube FAS2020 Capacity issue in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68108#M4759</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Try aggr show_space an/or df -g -A to see where the space went.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -Wei&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lwei</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-01T23:39:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Semi-Nube FAS2020 Capacity issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68084#M4754</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a Fas2020 ,that has 9 207GB drives in an aggregate configuration, Properties show type traditional, online, raid_dp. The system showed that 85% of the drive is used and we had 4 spares so we added two of the spares to the configuration. The total capacity before adding the two drives was listed as 592 GB and after adding the drives is still listed as 592 GB. So doing remedial math, we have 9 200 GB drives that should = 1.8TB of space I know that two of the drives are being used for Parity so we are now @ 1.4 TB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The big question is whay are we missing 800GB of sapce and why adding two drives didn't change the space available.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I "lucked" into helping with this system and need ll of the hlp I can get.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:19:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68084#M4754</guid>
      <dc:creator>mvetteplex</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:19:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Semi-Nube FAS2020 Capacity issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68089#M4755</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Hi Mike,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Did you expand the RAID-DP group size before adding the two drives? If not, it may add a new group in the aggregate and the two new drives become parity drives.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;How much space is reserved by the aggregate and/or volume(s)? That might explain the difference.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Wei&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68089#M4755</guid>
      <dc:creator>lwei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-29T22:14:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Semi-Nube FAS2020 Capacity issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68094#M4756</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;lwie,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, that at least gives me a direction to look, no we didn't expand the raid-dp before we added the new, it also doesn't look like it made a new group, here is what I see:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aggr status -r&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregate vol1 (online, raid_dp) (block checksums)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; Plex /vol1/plex0 (online, normal, active)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; RAID group /vol1/plex0/rg0 (normal)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; RAID Disk Device&amp;nbsp; HA&amp;nbsp; SHELF BAY CHAN Pool Type&amp;nbsp; RPM&amp;nbsp; Used (MB/blks)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Phys (MB/blks)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; --------- ------&amp;nbsp; ------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- --------------&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; --------------&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; dparity&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b.19&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200 211377/432901760&amp;nbsp; 211921/434014304&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; parity&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.20&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200 211377/432901760&amp;nbsp; 211921/434014304&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b.21&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200 211377/432901760&amp;nbsp; 211921/434014304&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.22&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200 211377/432901760&amp;nbsp; 211921/434014304&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.23&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200 211377/432901760&amp;nbsp; 211921/434014304&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.24&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200 211377/432901760&amp;nbsp; 211921/434014304&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b.29&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 13&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200 211377/432901760&amp;nbsp; 211921/434014304&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a.27&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0a&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 11&amp;nbsp; FC:A&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200 211377/432901760&amp;nbsp; 211921/434014304&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; data&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b.25&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0b&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 9&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; FC:B&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; ATA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7200 211377/432901760&amp;nbsp; 211921/434014304&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the input!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:48:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68094#M4756</guid>
      <dc:creator>mvetteplex</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T16:48:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Semi-Nube FAS2020 Capacity issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68099#M4757</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;You can check the RAID group size, expand it, then add the two disks:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&amp;gt;aggr status -r&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; // check for raidsize&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&amp;gt;aggr options aggr1 raidsize 16&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; // set aggr1 raidsize to 16&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&amp;gt;aggr add aggr1 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; // add 2 disks to aggr1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Wei&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:19:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68099#M4757</guid>
      <dc:creator>lwei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T18:19:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Semi-Nube FAS2020 Capacity issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68103#M4758</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually the aggr status -r does show the added drives so all added "correctly" according to what we can see, the real problem is after adding the drives the space doesn't appear, it still shows only 592 GB of space and 85% of that is used, so it appears that 4 of the drives aren't getting into the allocation pool?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68103#M4758</guid>
      <dc:creator>mvetteplex</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T18:57:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Semi-Nube FAS2020 Capacity issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68108#M4759</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Try aggr show_space an/or df -g -A to see where the space went.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -Wei&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Semi-Nube-FAS2020-Capacity-issue/m-p/68108#M4759</guid>
      <dc:creator>lwei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T23:39:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

