NetApp aggregates and volumes

HASMIK_HAYRAPETYAN — Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:38:32 GMT

Hi all,

As far as I understand aggregate is a physical storage and volumes are it's partitions. Is it possible to have some space on aggregate which doesn't belong to any volume?

I have an aggregate, where

Available Capacity is 74.878 MB

Total Capacity is 2.393.912 MB

And I have only one volume on it, wher

Available Capacity is 126.478 MB

Total Capacity is 1.844.838 MB

I have two things here:

aggr available capacity < volume available capacity (1. how this is possible?)

aggr total capacity > volume total capacity (2. so there is space on aggregate that doesn't belong to any volume?)

My third question is - I want to calculate total and available capacity for NetApp filer, I need to get sum of it's aggregates' capacities or volumes' capacities??

Regards,

Hasmik

Re: NetApp aggregates and volumes

Sebastian_Goetze — Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:18:37 GMT

Hi Hasmik,

it's not quite that simple...

While it's true, that Aggregates represent the physical aspect of storage, Volumes are not just a partition of an aggregate, but the logical representation of storage, made accessible to end users through storage access protocols (NFS/CIFS/ISCSI/FCP/...).

The number given as 'Available Capacity' for the aggregate is space available to be given to new volumes. It is not the amount of space actually being in use by user data, since volumes might have space guarantees set ("Thick Provisioning" - as yours obviously does). Also there's a certain amount of Meta Data within an Aggregate and you might have set space aside for Data Protection purposes ('snap reserve'). Therefore the aggregate will always have more total capacity than the sum of the total capacities of the volumes - if you thick provision... That should answer your second question.

The 'Available Capacity' within a volume represents the amount of space that is available to 'end users'. Therefore if you 'Thick Provision' your volumes it is nothing unusual, that you have more space available within your volumes than there is space available for additional new volumes in the aggregate. That should answer your first question.

If you want to calculate 'Available Capacity' from a user perspective, and you have a very traditional simple-minded approach to provisioning (everything thick provisioned, no dedupe, no compression, ...), then indeed you just have to sum up the available capacities of the volumes. (Third question)... But that will be a far cry from the maximum possible capacity!

Thin Provisioning and Deduplication/Compression can be a game changer!

We ourselves for example have a 15TB volume in a 3TB aggregate (obviously thin provisioned...). It contains ~14TB of user data - it's our virtual lab environment, very high dedupe rate. There's still almost 1TB free space in the aggregate! As you can see, to calculate the 'available capacity' from a user perspective can be a bit more complicated that to just add something up.

Utilisation rates even (far) beyond 100% are not unusual on NetApp storage.

(Utilization = Amount of used logical storage / Amount of physical storage)

My recommendation: Read up on the way NetApp does storage and/or take a NetApp Course.

You might (should!) have bought training units with your NetApp kit which you can use for this...

Sebastian

NCI (NetApp Certified Instructor)

- FastLane Training Centers: e.g. flane.de (my home base) or fastlaneus.com

Re: NetApp aggregates and volumes

HASMIK_HAYRAPETYAN — Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:43:18 GMT

Thank you very much for your detailed explanation!

Regards,

Hasmik

topic Re: NetApp aggregates and volumes in ONTAP Hardware

NetApp aggregates and volumes

Re: NetApp aggregates and volumes

Re: NetApp aggregates and volumes