<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Aggregate Setup and Disk Size in ONTAP Hardware</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Aggregate-Setup-and-Disk-Size/m-p/79223#M5573</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It actually doesn't look like this buys me much as far as useable space goes. If I create a 11 disk aggregate w/ all 2TB drives the usable size is 13.1 TB. The two mixed aggregates I was referring to in my first post would be 6.55 TB usable. I think going to go for the one large aggregate to avoid mixing disk sizes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:19:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>todd_horne</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-14T18:19:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Aggregate Setup and Disk Size</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Aggregate-Setup-and-Disk-Size/m-p/79218#M5572</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a new shelf of 2TB SATA drives (14 total). I also have a 2 drives left over that are 1TB SATA (So that's 16 total disks). Would it be OK to create two 7 disk aggregates, with each aggregate having one of the 1TB drives mixed with the 2TB drives? The remaining two 2TB drives would be used as hot spares.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:07:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Aggregate-Setup-and-Disk-Size/m-p/79218#M5572</guid>
      <dc:creator>todd_horne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:07:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggregate Setup and Disk Size</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Aggregate-Setup-and-Disk-Size/m-p/79223#M5573</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It actually doesn't look like this buys me much as far as useable space goes. If I create a 11 disk aggregate w/ all 2TB drives the usable size is 13.1 TB. The two mixed aggregates I was referring to in my first post would be 6.55 TB usable. I think going to go for the one large aggregate to avoid mixing disk sizes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:19:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Aggregate-Setup-and-Disk-Size/m-p/79223#M5573</guid>
      <dc:creator>todd_horne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-14T18:19:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggregate Setup and Disk Size</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Aggregate-Setup-and-Disk-Size/m-p/79227#M5574</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't forget to keep spares.&amp;nbsp; The 1TB cannot act as spares for an AGGR built out of all 2TB disks. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:36:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Hardware/Aggregate-Setup-and-Disk-Size/m-p/79227#M5574</guid>
      <dc:creator>loudymanschwab</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-14T18:36:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

